COVID-19

The Evidence

  EARLY COVID CARE EXPERTS  - WE CAN TREAT COVID-19

  Truth For Health Foundation  Early Home Treatment Guide  Must Know Info 

Important COVID-19 Info:

How governmental COVID measures caused more harm than COVID itself

Debate:  Natural Immunity vs. Vaccines       View Here

10 Legitimate Reasons So Many People Are Refusing The Covid Shots            View Here

Nationwide summary on 2021 COVID vaccine legislation in the US          View Here

30 Facts You Need To Know: A COVID Cribsheet            View Here

Ivermectin for COVID-19 Meta Analysis of Studies                       View Here

How Americans can resist coronavirus shot mandates – a comprehensive guide     View Here

10 Steps to dramatically improve the current situation:       View Here

Natural immunity offers better COVID protection than vaccine, Israeli study finds    View Here

130+ UK doctors: Failed COVID policies caused ‘massive’ harm, especially to children      View Here

Trusting the FDA, taking Pfizer’s COVID jab, ensures America stays ‘compliant’ and ‘stupid"      View Here

Dr. Peter McCullough tells RFK, Jr: ‘The vaccines are failing’      View Here

Japanese medical association chairman tells doctors to prescribe Ivermectin for COVID   View Here

COVID shots account for 1.5 million injuries, 15,472 deaths in Europe, EU reports   View Here

Former Pfizer VP warns childbearing-age women: ‘Do not accept these vaccines’      View Here

 

mRNA vaccine inventor: COVID-19 vaccines may make virus more dangerous       View Here

 

Nobel Prize winner: Mass COVID vaccination an ‘unacceptable mistake’           View Here

5 Important truths about Covid-19  Dr. Peter McCullough  (video)   View Here

Five reasons not to fear coronavirus variants       View Here

VAERS is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System put in place in 1990. It is a voluntary reporting system that has been estimated to account for only 1% (see the Lazarus Report) of vaccine injuries. OpenVAERS is built from the HHS data available for download at vaers.hhs.gov.     View Here

 

Numerous deaths, injuries following COVID jabs are increasing, as governments commit wilful misconduct.  View Here

 

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page.  View it here. 

Latest news and information on COVID-19  - a must for debating latest issues.   View here.

COVID vaccine mandates, passports are futile 3: How to fight back        View Here

47 studies confirm ineffectiveness of masks for COVID and 32 more confirm their negative health effects    View Here

 

 

   

Recent Articles on COVID

 

Dr. Ben Carson nails it on the suppression of existing therapies for COVID: ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine

12/06/21 Thomas Lifson - American Thinker (Must-see TV and must-see single graph that reveals how effective off-patent inexpensive therapies are in reducing COVID deaths.)

Renowned virologist warns of ‘collapse of our health system’ due to complications from COVID vaccines

12/03/21 Patrick Delaney - LifeSiteNews ( To the un-jabbed: ‘For God’s sake, stay unvaccinated! Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche warned of the damage being done to the immune systems of the vaccinated, and the inevitable grave consequences that would result.  A renowned virologist and former senior officer of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation recently warned against the dangers of the experimental COVID-19 gene-transfer vaccines, encouraged the un-jabbed to “stay unvaccinated,” and predicted an inevitable “collapse of our health system” due to health complications in the vaccinated.)

mRNA inventor stands with Abp. Viganò’s call for alliance against ‘fundamentally evil’ COVID tyranny

12/03/21 Maike Hickson - LiteSiteNews  ('It is impossible to make sense out of what is transpiring in the world right now just as an explanation of public health and in vaccine policy or antiviral policy, and I have become convinced that we're in a situation in which we're all having our rights eroded and that there is a larger force beyond this.')

COVID patient left for ‘dead’ recovers after court forces hospital to allow ivermectin treatment

12/01/21 Jack Bringham - LifeSiteNews (On Thanksgiving weekend, Sun Ng, a 71-year-old man who spent 22 days on a ventilator with COVID-19, was discharged following a court-mandated successful treatment cycle of ivermectin. According to a press release distributed on behalf of Mauck & Baker law firm in Chicago, the court-ordered ivermectin treatment was given to Ng for five days, November 8 through November 12, and he was discharged on November 27, having fully recovered.)

The COVID Vaccine Failure

12/01/21 Jamaica Plain - American Thinker (Whenever the medical elites' narrative falls apart, the emphasis shifts, cover-up lies become bolder, and dissenting science is censored.)

COVID hysteria, Big Business corruption exposed in new book by former NY Times writer

12/01/21 Steven Mosher - LifeSiteNews (The first was that, contrary to what we had been told by Communist China, COVID was far less threatening than it had originally seemed. Yes, it could be deadly, especially to the elderly and people with severe comorbidities such as kidney disease. But it was not the second coming of the Black Death. It wasn’t going to kill 5 percent of those it infected. It would not overwhelm the medical system, much less all of society. And he was right. Cuomo would soon be shipping respirators to other states.)

EXCLUSIVE | Nurse Blows The Whistle On Heinous Medical Malpractice: Doctors Abandoned Protocol and Covid Patients Died

11/22/21  Alicia Powe - The Gateway Pundit (A nurse who has worked in the intensive care unit for over two decades is sounding the alarm on the disturbing malpractice she has witnessed and was subjected to in a hospital’s intensive care unit throughout the coronavirus pandemic. As the medical community adjusts to treating the man-made virus, a Chi-com bioweapon, the end of the “state of emergency” appears to have no end. The Covid shots are killing healthy young adults at an unprecedented rate and depleting natural immunity, Helen Smith, a veteran nurse who is traumatized from what she has seen while working in the intensive care unit during the “pandemic,” in an exclusive interview with the Gateway Pundit.)

The Benefit Of SARS-CoV-2 Natural Immunity In The Armed Forces

11/22/2021 Tyler Durden - LifeSiteNews (All members of the armed services should receive SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing, and if positive, be automatically exempted from Covid vaccination..)

Fauci Finally Admits Vaccines Don’t Protect Against Serious Covid or Death

22/19/212 Vasko Kohlmayer - American Thinker (Last week, Dr. Anthony Fauci made perhaps the most damning confession in the Covid vaccine saga. So far-reaching are the implications of his statement that the interview in which he made it may well prove a turning point in the fight against the vaccine fraud that is being perpetrated on the peoples of the world.)

Dr. Peter McCullough sues medical journal for refusing to publish study showing COVID shot risks for children

11/16/21 John-Henry Westen - LifeSiteNews ('This is an overt act of censorship,' he said. 'We will be launching a full scale lawsuit ... for breach of contract.' Top COVID expert Dr. Peter McCullough has some explosive news regarding the experimental ‘vaccines’ and how the medical establishment is refusing to show the truth about them.)

Lies, Half-Truths, and Misinformation Used to Sell the Covid Jab

11/16/21 Steve McCann (In the spring of this year, Jill Biden on behalf of the administration stated unequivocally: “The vaccine is safe and effective, and it saves lives.”  A post-election message that Anthony Fauci, the CDC and the pharmaceutical companies had been touting since November of 2020. How safe are the vaccines?)

Dr. Peter McCullough: The COVID shot is a form of ‘bioterrorism,’ its spike protein is ‘pathogenic’

11/15/21 Patrick Delaney (McCullough was adamant that the available COVID vaccines are dangerous. His presentation included documentation demonstrating that all age groups are more likely to die from the vaccines than from COVID-19, that the vaccinated are just as much a virus transmission threat to others as the unvaccinated, and that those who have recovered from the disease have a 56% greater chance of severe side-effects should they afterwards take the jab. )

CDC director can’t answer senator’s question about how many agency workers are ‘fully vaccinated’

11/15/21 Jack Bingham (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director Rochelle Walensky once again avoided answering questions regarding the vaccine uptake rate at her agency, and the CDC’s approach to COVID in the workplace more broadly. In the same hearing, Fauci, speaking on behalf of the NIH, told Burr that while he is “not 100 percent sure,” he believes only “a little bit more than half, probably around 60 percent” of staff at the NIH have elected to receive one of the experimental vaccines against COVID-19.)

Creepy cover-up of COVID death data at Rachel Levine's Pennsylvania department of health

11/12/21 Monica Showalter (This is the kind of behavior a gamy third-world banana republic, the kind that hides out from the International Monetary Fund's eagle-eyed moneymen, would be involved in. It's not the behavior of a first-world state, less still a state like Pennsylvania which is one of America's largest and most economically important.)

The Hippocratic Oath And Medical Ethics Versus COVID Mandates

11/12/21 Jeff M. Lewis (In their reliance upon what is theoretical, rather than the realities and empirically verifiable truths of history, all that these government eggheads know how to do, and what they think will work but rarely does, is to mandate—something, anything—and their job is done. Their mandates are garbage and are hurting America. The world is not safer if America is diminished. Americans cannot prosper if America’s “full economic potential” is left unrealized. The most maddening part is, on every front and on every issue, these are self-inflicted wounds. America is being “suicided” by those we have elected.)

‘Don’t get vaccinated’: Toxicologist reveals how Pfizer got its COVID shot approved by the FDA

11/10/21 Dr. Joseph Mercola ('In other words, Pfizer plans, with FDA connivance, to use an entirely new vaccine formulation in children, after their clinical trials used the old formulation,' said Dr. Meryl Nass. In this interview, Dr. Meryl Nass, an internist specializing in toxicology, vaccine-induced illnesses and Gulf War illness, shares her insights into the dangers of the COVID jab, which received an emergency use authorization October 26, 2021, for children as young as 5.)

Bayer executive: mRNA shots are ‘gene therapy’ marketed as ‘vaccines’ to gain public trust

11/10/21 Jack Bringham (‘We probably would have had a 95% refusal rate’ for these shots two years ago, but the pandemic and marketing of the injections as ‘vaccines’ has made them popular with the public, said Stefan Oelrich. The president of Bayer’s Pharmaceuticals Division told international “experts” during a globalist health conference that the mRNA COVID-19 shots are indeed “cell and gene therapy” marketed as “vaccines” to be palatable to the public.)

Getting Through the Next Six Months of COVID

11/09/21 Thomas T. siler, Jr., MD (People are beginning to realize that COVID-19 is not extremely dangerous to the healthy below age 70. Cases and deaths are going down in spite of attempts to inflate cases with faulty tests and inflate deaths with a faulty definition of who dies from COVID-19. More people are understanding that Dr. Fauci was involved with the creation of the virus in Wuhan and is not telling the truth. Many states are doing better with no lockdowns, masking, or vaccine mandates.)

‘Total disregard for the exemption process’: Nurse exposes the manipulation from hospital admins

11/05/21 (Nurse Dani tells her story of standing against the manipulation from her hospital administration to have her and others get the COVID jab, and why she chose to resign rather than get an exemption. In the latest episode of The Ladies of LifeSite, Reba and Maddie are joined by nurse Dani, who after 20 years experience and 16 years in pediatric nursing decided to leave her career rather than give in to medical tyranny.)

Harvard epidemiologist dismantles CDC study attacking COVID natural immunity

11/03/21 Art Moore  (Dr. Martin Kulldorf has worked on vaccine epidemiology for nearly twenty years, since joining the Harvard faculty, and is among many epidemiologists who have quickly pointed out the CDC study’s fatal flaws. 

11 doctors injured by COVID shot go public, urge CDC and FDA to acknowledge vaccine risks

11/03/21 Ashley Sadle ('A group of very sick and injured people in this country are being treated very poorly and with complete lack of dignity and empathy. It is time for this to stop,” said one physician who was affected by her COVID-19 shot in December.  Eleven physicians who suffered serious injuries from their COVID-19 injections have gone public, urging federal agencies and other doctors to recognize the risks posed by the experimental drugs, conduct thorough investigations, and provide transparency to all those considering taking the shots, according to a story published by the Catholic World Report on Monday.)

These 6 studies show why children should never be injected with the COVID shot

11/02/21  Dr. Paul Elias Alexander ('To consider subjecting healthy children to this risk to protect adults is perverse, reckless, and very dangerous.' 'Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche says mass vaccination turns children into shedders of more infectious variants.' This is potentially a very serious issue, for the vaccine offers children no opportunity for benefit and only potential for harms. We could end up killing thousands of our children with these safety untested vaccines. There is no proper safety data, either medium or long-term, and parents must stand up now and say NO! )

 

'Falsified Data': Pfizer Vaccine Trial Had Major Flaws, Whistleblower Tells Peer-Reviewed Journal

11/02/21 Tyler Durden (A whistleblower involved in Pfizer's pivotal phase III Covid-19 vaccine trial has leaked evidence to a notable peer-reviewed medical publication that poor practices at the contract research company she worked for raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight. Brook Jackson, a now-fired regional director at Ventavia Research Group, revealed to The BMJ that vaccine trials at several sites in Texas last year had major problems - including falsified data, broke fundamental rules, and were 'slow' to report adverse reactions. When she notified superiors of the issues she found, they fired her.)

WATCH: Vaccine injury stories pour in after Israeli mom launches project to expose untold suffering

11/01/21 David Mcloone (A courageous woman is shedding light on the extensive damage caused by the Pfizer jab and encourages others to do the same.  A courageous woman has taken up the task of investigating and reporting injuries from the Pfizer COVID jab that the media have ignored in her home country of Israel, where the government has administered the shot almost ubiquitously.)

The research is in: COVID jabs are ineffective at preventing coronavirus infections

October 29, 2021    Paul Elias Alexander, PhD      Life Site News

Twenty-two further studies and reports provide evidence that the COVID-19 injections are failing in their advertized purpose.

(Brownstone Institute) – The evidence is pouring in that the COVID-19 vaccines are not as efficacious as advertised against the Delta variant that became dominant in the fall of 2021. The Delta is learning how to thrive. The evidence has further accumulated to show that the vaccinated are showing viral loads (very high) similar to the unvaccinated, and the vaccinated are equally as infectious.

The gestalt of the findings implies that the infection explosion globally – post double vaccination e.g. Israel, UK, US etc. – that we have been experiencing may be likely due to the possibility that the vaccinated are driving the epidemic/pandemic and not the unvaccinated. We have been vaccinating against the wild-type virus that is no longer a pressing concern, even if the vaccine data so far suggests effectiveness for the demographic most susceptible to severe outcomes.

The data seems to suggest that the infection is 50:50 (vaccinated versus unvaccinated) while the U.K. is reporting 70% of deaths in the vaccinated (Delta variant) though there is debate on differential based on < 50 versus >50 years old. It appears that it is the vaccinated who are getting infected and thus transmitting the virus at a far greater rate. This unravels the demand for universal vaccine passports.

With the Marek’s disease (‘leaky’ non-sterilizing, non-neutralizing imperfect vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not stop infection or transmission) in chickens model, and the concept of the Original antigenic sin (if an initial exposure or priming of the immune system is sub-optimal (Eugyppius) e.g. vaccination with the 2020 spike protein epitopes,) then the sub-optimal priming is basically “fixed.” That is to say, it prejudices the life-long immune response with re-exposure due to the immune memory or learning.

Here I present a combination of 22 studies and stories that underscore just how big a problem this is for the NIH, CDC, FDA, and vaccine developers. It certainly highlights the problems with vaccine mandates that are currently threatening the jobs of millions of people. It raises further doubts about the case for vaccinating children.

Cases in point:

1) Gazit et al. out of Israel showed that “SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees had a 13.06-fold (95% CI, 8.08 to 21.11) increased risk for breakthrough infection with the Delta variant compared to those previously infected.”

2) Acharya et al. found “no significant difference in cycle threshold values between vaccinated and unvaccinated, asymptomatic and symptomatic groups infected with SARS-CoV-2 Delta.”

3) Riemersma et al. found “no difference in viral loads when comparing unvaccinated individuals to those who have vaccine “breakthrough” infections. Furthermore, individuals with vaccine breakthrough infections frequently test positive with viral loads consistent with the ability to shed infectious viruses.” Results indicate that “if vaccinated individuals become infected with the delta variant, they may be sources of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to others.” They reported “low Ct values (<25) in 212 of 310 fully vaccinated (68%) and 246 of 389 (63%) unvaccinated individuals. Testing a subset of these low-Ct samples revealed infectious SARS-CoV-2 in 15 of 17 specimens (88%) from unvaccinated individuals and 37 of 39 (95%) from vaccinated people.”

4) Chemaitelly et al. reported a Qatar study which showed that the vaccine efficacy (Pfizer) declined to near zero by 5 to 6-months and even immediate protection after one to two months were largely exaggerated.

5) A Siri reporting suggests that as high as 90% of hospitalizations in the US are among the vaccinated.

More Here

Multiple members of FDA committee that supports jab for kids have close ties to Pfizer

October 28,  2021       Kennedy Hall         Life Site News

An FDA Committee that recommended approval of Pfizer’s COVID jab for young kids on Tuesday featured multiple members with significant connections to the pharmaceutical giant. Some of the committee members had professional and financial ties to Pfizer, having worked on projects sponsored by the drug company in the past.

Committee member Archana Chatterjee worked on a project researching the vaccination of infants for two years that was sponsored by Pfizer. Dr. Myron Levine mentored the senior director of vaccine research and development at Pfizer, Raphael Simon.

 

Dr. Geeta Krishna Swamy has served as a “co-investigator” for a Pfizer vaccine trial, according to Duke University. Former vice president for Pfizer Vaccines, Greg Sylvester, also had a hand in the committee.

At the meeting, 17 members voted in favor of approval, one abstained, and nobody voted against it, judging that the benefits of jabbing children between 5 and 11 years old with the Pfizer shot outweigh any other health risks. The abortion-tainted jab has not been officially approved yet, but the FDA will make a final decision within days and is expected to follow the advice of the committee.

Some experts have raised concerns over the lack of safety and efficacy data presented by Pfizer for use of its COVID vaccine in younger children. Those who have objected to a wide-scale child jab initiative have pointed to increasing safety signals based on reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

Significant risks of myocarditis have been brought to light by experts who study the available data of adverse reactions reported after children are jabbed. American cardiologist, Dr. Peter McCullough has warned about the risks of heart inflammation in children who are jabbed. In August he said: “We are at 5,093 cases of myocarditis as of August 20 in the US. We haven’t really ramped up vaccinating kids yet. This is the tip of the iceberg. In no way should a parent think that myocarditis is rare, because it’s not. We’re talking about thousands of children already have developed myocarditis.”

Pfizer admitted in a report released on Friday before the meeting that its test group was “too small to detect any potential risks of myocarditis associated with vaccination.” The pharma giant intimated that it doesn’t know the long-term effects of the jab, but studies will be conducted over the next few years.

More Here

Yale disease expert tells parents to pull kids out of schools, educate them at home to avoid jab mandates

October 27, 2021       Art Moore         Life Site News

Editor’s Note: This article was written before the FDA advisory committee endorsed Pfizer’s injection for children aged 5-11.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center

 

(WND News Center) – As an FDA advisory panel prepares to decide whether or not to recommend the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine for young children, Yale epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch is advising parents to remove their children from any public school that forces students to get the shots.

Risch said Sunday night in an interview that children with serious chronic conditions “should be considered for vaccination.”

“Other than that, if it were my child, I would homeschool them,” he told Fox News host Mark Levin.

Risch is a professor of epidemiology in the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health at the Yale School of Public Health and Yale School of Medicine. A former member of the board of editors for the American Journal of Epidemiology, he is an author of more than 350 original peer-reviewed research publications.

“Honestly, I would organize with other parents to take them out of the school and create homeschooling environments,” Risch said.

“There’s no choice. Your child’s life is on the line.”

He acknowledged that vaccination “is not a high risk that’s going to kill every child.”

“However, it’s enough of a risk, that on the average the benefit is higher for homeschooling than it is for vaccination and being in school.”

CDC statistics show children generally do not spread COVID-19 and have little risk of any adverse effects. The seasonal flu is more deadly among children than COVID-19, and the swine flu one decade ago was six times more deadly. The survival rate for children under age 20 who get COVID, according to the CDC, is 99.998%. And CDC Director Rochelle Walensky admitted in August the vaccines had become ineffective in stopping the spread of the virus.

An FDA advisory panel is scheduled to meet Tuesday to discuss Pfizer’s emergency use authorization request to administer its vaccine to children ages 5 to 11. A briefing document posted by the FDA in preparation for the meeting acknowledged that clinical trials have not addressed the potential risk of myocarditis in that age group.

The risk will be studied after authorization, according to the document, in five “post-authorization safety studies,” including a five-year, “follow-up study” to evaluate the long term risk of heart inflammation.

The risk of myocarditis was cited last month by an FDA advisory panel that voted 16-2 against Pfizer booster shots for people 16 to 65. Last week, the FDA delayed its decision on administration to young people of the Moderna vaccine.

Pfizer and Moderna employ the messenger RNA technology, which “teach” cells to make a protein that triggers an immune response rather than inserting a live virus, as do traditional vaccines. The FDA is planning to review the data regarding myocarditis further before making a decision, the Wall Street Journal reported.

Sweden, Finland and Norway have halted the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine for younger people, and Iceland has stopped administering the shot to everyone, as WND reported. Earlier this month, France’s health authority advised against using the Moderna vaccine because of the myocarditis risk.

More Here

Standard COVID treatments like remdesivir ‘are set up to kill,’ medical expert warns

October 27, 2021        David McLoone              Life Site News

Dr. Bryan Ardis explained in detail the dangers associated with remdesivir, a drug that has been widely prescribed to patients with COVID-19.

TUCSON, Arizona (LifeSiteNews) — An expert in medicine has warned that hospitals using remdesivir and ventilators to treat COVID-19 patients are doing more harm than good, explaining that “[t]hese protocols are set up to kill.”

Speaking at the Truth for Health Foundation’s latest virtual conference exposing human rights violations in American hospitals, Dr. Bryan Ardis explained in detail the dangers associated with remdesivir, a drug that has been widely prescribed to patients with COVID-19. In combination with mechanical ventilation, Ardis said remdesivir is responsible for expediting the deaths of “a lot of Americans [who are admitted to hospital] innocently looking for treatment.”

Ardis, who serves on the Truth for Health Foundation’s advisory council, has been speaking out consistently against hospital protocols for COVID-19 positive patients, which are being followed “lockstep” throughout the country, since May 2020, owing to toxicity concerns from remdesivir. Ardis’ father-in-law died while on a remdesivir protocol last year.

The medical expert explained that President Joe Biden’s chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci originally pushed to have remdesivir administered to COVID patients from May 1, 2020, at which point he attempted to discredit the effectiveness of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drug hydroxychloroquine, “saying it was ineffective, dangerous, and could kill COVID-19 patients.”

“Fauci declared that there was one drug, and one drug only, that he was going to use in all hospitals throughout America to treat COVID 19 hospitalized patients,” Ardis said. That drug is remdesivir.

Based on a trial against Ebola, a rare and deadly disease most prevalent in Africa, Fauci said the drug was “safe and effective.” However, Ardis examined the studies Fauci cited to conclude on remdesivir’s usefulness, discovering that “Fauci flat out was lying to the American public and they’re still lying to you.”

Halfway through the Ebola trial, remdesivir was dropped from the study as it was producing a mortality rate of over 50 percent among the trial group. “Remdesivir was proven halfway through that study to be the least effective and had the highest death totals of all [people] treated” in terms of percentage, Ardis noted.

second study involving remdesivir, this time from the drug’s manufacturer Gilead Sciences, failed before completion, with numerous test subjects being taken off of the drug owing to dangerous adverse events.

Ardis said that “these are very important studies for you to understand because this murderous cocktail is still what is the primary cause of death [in hospital treatment for COVID], I am convinced.”

Continuing, he said that “for all hospitalized patients in COVID-19 treatment, it is not the infection [which kills], it is the treatment protocol.”

“How do I know it? Because acute kidney failure, liver failure, multiple organ failure are known side effects [of remdesivir],” all of which have been found “in upwards of 30 percent of all people you give remdesivir to that have COVID-19.”

More Here

Audio tapes reveal hospitals are depriving COVID patients of nutrition, intentionally isolating them

October 27, 2021      David McLoone       Life Site News

Ali Schultz saw medical tyranny first-hand as her parents in law faced strong opposition from their respective hospitals regarding how to treat their illness with COVID-19.

TUCSON, Arizona (LifeSiteNews) — Explosive interviews aired during the Truth for Health Foundation’s “Stop the Shot: Caught on Tape” conference Wednesday reveal that American hospitals are holding patients as prisoners while denying them life-saving treatment and nutrition.

Ali Schultz is a lawyer with the Foundation’s legal advisory council working with the medical team in the trenches where they deal with hospital abuses as they assist family members who are desperate to get their loved ones out of the hospital to save their lives.

Schultz saw the medical tyranny first-hand as her mother-in-law and father-in-law both faced strong opposition from their respective hospitals regarding how to treat their illness with COVID-19. Ultimately, Schultz’s mother-in-law lost that battle, dying on September 17. She had been neglected by staff when she wouldn’t accept remdesivir, a dangerous protocol which has been associated with high levels of liver and kidney failure.

Schultz did, however, manage to have her father-in-law Chuck “released” from hospital on September 16, she said, adding that his exit from hospital was more like an escape from prison. “He was not let go or discharged. He had to be released.”

Schultz explained that she was a medical power of attorney for both of her sick in-laws and that they had both notified the hospital in an advance directive that they did not want to receive remdesivir or be forced onto mechanical ventilation.

Although both parents-in-law were admitted to different hospitals, “they had the same exact protocol … and since they refused remdesivir I felt like we were just punished.”

“And the reason why they refuse remdesivir, and I agree with them, is because it’s known to cause kidney toxicity and failure, which ultimately leads to more pulmonary congestion,” Schultz said. “I’m obviously not a doctor, but we’ve done a lot of research on this because you have to when you’re advocating for your own health.”

After completing their research into the effects of remdesivir, the family was “adamant about refusing it, and after that, I felt like we were totally punished.”

While Chuck was being treated by the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, Arizona, prior to his release, Schultz said that nurses were not implementing any kind of plan for him to become stable enough to transfer out of the critical care unit. “They just had no plan to treat him off of oxygen and no plan to get him home,” Schultz stated. Coercion for patients to use remdesivir is so strong that Schultz suggested Mayo has no protocol “for the noncompliant” to leave their critical care units in good health.

Even with medical power of attorney, Schultz shared that she was unable to verify basic vital treatments like hydration and nourishment. The lawyer penned letters and emails advocating for both of her parents-in-law and was subsequently met with strong pushback, being denied access to their health records and even to the patients themselves, at one point being handcuffed and carried away. “I was deprived access to them, and I was lied to,” she said.

Schultz later found out that the hospital had denied Chuck food and water for six consecutive days, save for one bag of sugar water.

The lawyer explained that hospitals have a “perverse financial incentive” to keep using the remdesivir protocol initially implemented by Dr. Anthony Fauci, the chief medical adviser to the president.

“From a legal perspective,” Schultz added, “they have zero liability whatsoever for any COVID patients so as long as they’re doing that [Fauci’s protocol]. They think that they are totally immune except for wilful misconduct which, of course, they would be liable for.”

An audio recording taken by Schultz in conversation with a Mayo Clinic administrator revealed that the hospital knew that they were depriving Chuck of nutrition and claimed that “when someone is admitted having that many problems with breathing,” that this “is exactly what they do.”

More Here

Physicians and the Vaccine Tyranny

October 21, 2021       Blaise Edwards, M. D.       American Thinker

I find myself in the position that I must use an alias for fear of reprisal.  Those days may be quickly coming to an end, as hospitals are denying requests for vaccine exemptions with impunity.  I will likely soon be out the door, with nothing to lose.  Even if I survive this round, if the “pandemic” continues, it won’t be long before I am shelved like a can of spam.

Doctors need to be called out.  From early in the pandemic, it was like a mass hypnosis or forgetfulness of everything we had learned in medical school.  Immune system knowledge was shelved and replaced by government dictates.  The thought of early outpatient treatment with “off label” drugs that could modulate the immune system was forbidden.  We essentially told patients that they had to go home and wait until they were sick enough to be hospitalized, then treatment would begin.  Imagine telling all diabetics that there is no metformin, Glucophage, or insulin.  Would we really wait until patients are in diabetic ketoacidosis, and then treat them only at the hospital?  It is medical malfeasance of a grand scale

.

We physicians gave up our training and our reasonable medical thought process.  The reasons are multiple.  First, it was the easy way out.  Second, many of us are employed and fear reprisal.  Third, despite what the public thinks, we physicians are not bold leaders, we tend to be sheep, and are afraid of having an entire institution ostracize us or our colleagues to think us crazy.

As we got to the point of vaccine rollout, doctors were not using the scientific method, questioning and challenging prevailing hypotheses.  They kept their heads down, closed clinics, converted to telemedicine, and pushed only the jab.

I had conversations with doctors who are supposed experts in virology and immunology denying the lasting immunity of natural infection.  Conversations about natural immunity:

More Here

Fully vaccinated are COVID ‘super-spreaders,’ says inventor of mRNA technology

October 18, 2021       Jeremy Loffredo        Life Site News

On the latest episode of 'The Hidden Gateway' podcast, Dr. Robert Malone, recognized for his role in inventing mRNA vaccine technology, said, 'The idea that if you have a workplace where everybody's vaccinated, you're not going to have virus spread is totally false. A total lie.'

(Children’s Health Defense) – On the latest episode of “The Hidden Gateway” podcast, host Jesston Williams spoke to Dr. Robert Malone, an internationally recognized medical doctor and scientist who assisted with inventing mRNA vaccines.

 

The wide-ranging discussion covered:

  • The invention and early testing of mRNA technology, in which Malone was heavily involved.

  • How governments are employing different forms of coercion to drive vaccine uptake, policies Malone said he believes are illegal.

  • How public health authorities lack the normally required safety and efficacy information for a global vaccination campaign.

  • How governments and public health authorities are lying to the public “for their own good.”

Malone referenced two instances where citizens are being “enticed” to take what he refers to as the “experimental” vaccine.

“There was a period where West Virginia was trying to get people to get vaccinated,” Malone said. “And so they had a shotgun lottery. And in Canada, there was a policy of offering free ice cream to children to get them to take the jab even without their parents’ approval. So those are just two particularly clear examples of unfair coercion … It’s not actually legal.”

Malone likened what’s going on today with COVID vaccines to the illegal medical experiments conducted by Nazi Germany. “[During the Second World War], Jews and other ethnic groups were subjected to horrible experimental medical research,” Malone said. “And they justified it by saying it was for the common good.”

Malone said the Western World “agreed we weren’t going to do that anymore. Yet, from time to time we seem to forget, and of course, Tuskegee is one example, and frankly, this is another example.”

In an attempt to clear up misinformation coming from the medical establishment, Malone said fully vaccinated individuals can spread COVID. “The idea that if you have a workplace where everybody’s vaccinated, you’re not going to have virus spread is totally false. A total lie,” Malone said.

The vaccinated are actually the “super-spreaders” that everyone was told about in the beginning of the pandemic, Malone argued.

More Here

 

Nebraska AG's devastating critique of the suppression of effective COVID therapies

October 17, 2021      Jarrad winter         Amercan Thinker

Legal opinions usually aren't terribly fun to read, but if you've been an ivermectin and/or hydroxychloroquine advocate for use against Wuhan Plague, this one definitely will bring you much joy.

It's a rather lengthy and full spectrum opinion issued by Doug Peterson, Nebraska's Attorney General, in response to a query from the state's Department of Health and Human Services as to whether physicians can be persecuted and tormented for prescribing ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine to patients sick with the China Flu. What the AG's response amounts to is a full and complete takedown of the conspiracy to suppress cheap and effective early Covid-19 treatments.

All the players -- FDA, CDC, Fauci, Big Pharma, the media, all of them -- get a glorious and swift kick in the rear end. Portions of it even made me laugh out loud. As far as legal documents go, it's definitely easy reading and understandable to everyone. It seems clear that the AG's office went to some trouble to layout the whole saga in a way the masses can understand without translation by legal scholars.

What follows are some of the most relevant parts (at least in my sometimes-humble opinion), but it really is in everyone's best interest to personally read the opinion in full. People must individually understand what's actually happening for themselves. This is what will enable We The People to course correct and divert from the ruinous path set for us by the overlords.

As to the question of ivermectin as a treatment option:

The Mahmud study–a CRT that explored ivermectin as an early treatment for 363 individuals–concluded that “patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 infection treated with ivermectin plus doxycycline recovered earlier, were less likely to progress to more serious disease, and were more likely to be COVID-19 negative on day 14. And Niaee’s research team found that ivermectin can help even hospitalized patients. That group conducted a “randomized, double-

blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial” with 180 hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19. They concluded that ivermectin “reduces the rate of mortality and duration of hospitalization in adult COVID-19 patients,” and the improvement of other clinical parameters showed that the ivermectin, with a wide margin of safety, had a high therapeutic effect on COVID-19.

More Here

About COVID: What does 'follow the science' really mean?

October 7, 2021     Ulids Sprogis         American Thinker

About COVID vaccinations, everyone should be "following the science" and not political opinion. Is this really a true statement and what science are we talking about?

True science uses the scientific method which proposes a hypothesis, principle, or assumption. Then science proceeds with experimentation. Then science sometimes yields repeatable identical results to prove the hypothesis is true. This is followed up with a rigorous mathematical equation or a known proven chemical product for experimental chemical reactions which is what vaccine development science is all about. Science proves clear cause-effect relationships between variables or factors.

What pseudo-science is is statistics or percentages which show the probability or odds of results based on initial conditions or factors which may or may not be related to the final results or conclusions. Statistics and probabilities really do not experimentally prove any cause-effect relationships between the variables or factors being assumed to be related.

A perfect example is voter polling statistics which depends largely on who is selected for the test sample and in what format the questions are asked. The predicted voting results vs the actual voting results can be off by as much as 10% or more if the voter polling is intentionally biased to begin with.

Statistics is really just collecting data or information without experimentation and coming up with conclusions about what the collected data often subjectively means or implies. You may randomly select a test sample of 100 students from your community and find that not one has contracted COVID. Based on this relatively small test sample you may erroneously conclude that all students in your state or even all the country have not contracted COVID, which would be a false conclusion. Inadequate or erroneous test sampling is just one of the many major drawbacks of statistical analysis.

Even worse is to make assumptions and conclusions without any experimental evidence, especially with humans who can’t easily be experimented with under controlled laboratory conditions. Human variables or factors are extremely complex since humans are widely different physically and biologically, have different diets and lifestyles, live under a wide variety of conditions, and there are so many humans numerically speaking. All these and other almost never ending human factors can potentially alter any statistical analysis of the population in general and lead to faulty statistical conclusions often expressed as percentages.

No scientific experiment was performed to test the difference in the spread of covid indoors vs outdoors. No experiment was performed to test the efficacy of spread prevention among the hundreds of different mask materials. No experiment was performed to prove what distancing rule works and where it works. No experiment was conducted to compare the COVID spread of carriers of COVID vs. COVID-infected individuals. No experiment was conducted comparing the efficacy of one vaccine type vs another type of vaccine. No experiment has been conducted to show the long range bad side effects of a COVID vaccine. No experiment has been conducted to show how long COVID vaccines last. No experiment is possible to show the actual death rate from COVID since many deaths were recorded as COVID but had other illness causes. In effect, none of the COVID anti-measures have been scientifically investigated and proven and no statistical samples have been analyzed so there is no real science to follow at the present time.

MORE HERE

The myth of asymptomatic COVID transmission doomed America’s pandemic response

October 7, 2021      Paul Elias Alexander, PhD       Life Site News

Seven falsehoods or misleading opinions on COVID-19 have led to incalculable loss.

HAMILTON, Ontario (LifeSiteNews) – Asymptomatic spread is virtually non-existent, and if this does occur, it accounts for fewer than 1% of cases.

Asymptomatic spread is very rare, and we have very limited and questionable evidence of it happening at all. We have no documented proof, no documented evidence of this occurring in any appreciable manner. I argue that the concept of asymptomatic spread for COVID-19 was a falsehood and a means both to deceive and mislead then-President Trump and the nation and to drive fear and paranoia. The myth of asymptomatic spread was pure propaganda in my view, based on what I present below. It is one of the narratives about the virus, similar to the issue of recurrent infection, that has not been proven by anyone, and it is used to drive the illogical, irrational, specious, and unscientific lockdowns, school closures, and mask mandates. This crisis is mainly a pandemic of fear and propaganda by government bureaucrats, the technocrats, the uninformed dishonest media, and the absurd television medical advisors.

How did this issue of ‘asymptomatic spread’ come about? Spread of a pathogen will occur more surely when the carriers are sick with symptoms, especially if the symptoms function to expel the pathogen into the surrounding air. Having no symptoms or very mild symptoms reduces the risk of spread, and with no symptoms, spread is basically removed. This is the same for SARS-CoV-2 virus, and a recent BMJ publication pretty well concludes that asymptomatic COVID carriers are rarely the drivers they were thought to be.

This is basic immunology and should not be changed for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). I am being emphatic in saying there is no evidence of asymptomatic spread. I also recognize that I must be careful not to claim ‘zero,’ for the evidence changes daily and rapidly, and absence of documented evidence is also not a reason to rule it out entirely. It may just have not been studied yet or documented optimally. But I am confident enough based on the existing literature to agree  that ‘it is a dangerous assumption to believe that there is persuasive, scientific evidence of asymptomatic transmission’.

The basis for the societal lockdowns was that 40% to 50% of persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 could potentially spread it, even though asymptomatic. “But fears that the virus may be spread to a significant degree by asymptomatic carriers soon led government leaders to issue broad and lengthy stay-at-home orders and mask mandates out of concerns that anyone could be a silent spreader.” However, the evidence in support of common asymptomatic spread remains largely non-existent and, I argue, was overstated and may have been made with no basis.  It’s existence was a bogus claim by the administration, by the medical advisors, then, meant to drive fear, and it continues to this day when they know they are deceiving the public.

MORE HERE

‘We’re in the middle of a major biological catastrophe’: COVID expert Dr. Peter McCullough

October 6, 2021        Patrick Delaney         Life Site News

In a recent lecture, Dr. Peter McCullough presented alarming data related to COVID vaccines, the fraud of national health authorities, the ‘Therapeutic Nihilism’ being exercised in hospitals, and the urgent necessity of active resistance.  

(LifeSiteNews) — Prominent physician Dr. Peter McCullough recently provided a well-documented lecture on the “catastrophe” of COVID-19 “gene-transfer” vaccines, the “loaded weapon” of the spike protein they produce, and the high effectiveness early treatments.

  

He also detailed the malfeasance, fraud, and conflicts-of-interest committed by U.S. medical officials. 

 

McCullough, who has made the case that he is the world’s foremost authority on the topic, set the tone for his remarks when he began to address a full hotel ballroom in Michigan on September 24.

 

“I think the reason why everybody’s here is we have a sense that something very bad is going on in the world. And I’m here to tell you, I think it is,” he said. 

 

“If you feel tension right now and you feel some emotional distress and if you feel as if things aren’t going right … I think your perceptions are correct,” the physician continued.

 

“And if your perceptions are correct, now’s the time for action.” 

McCullough calmly explained how his professional titles are being taken from him.

 

“Today I was stripped of the editorship of Cardiorenal Medicine, a Swiss-based journal and in the last year, I have lost my job at a major health system, with no explanation and no due process,” he said.

 

“I’ve been stripped of every title that I’ve ever had in that institution. I’ve received a threat letter from the American College of Physicians, [and] a threat letter from the American Board. 

This has happened because of his “lawful” participation “in a topic of public importance,” he said. 

“What we are doing is lawful,” he told the packed ballroom.  

“What’s not lawful, and what’s not right, is what’s happening with respect to censorship and the threat of reprisal.” 

McCullough predicted that the eight professional acronyms behind his name, “will be progressively erased.” This is “going to happen because there’s powerful forces at work, far more powerful than we can possibly think of, that are influencing anybody who is in a position of authority.” 

Explaining his background further, he described how in his distant past he was “on President Clinton’s advisory panel to healthcare,” and had been “on C-SPAN for seven hours getting fried by the senators.” And thus, he explained, “I’m not new to the national scene.” 

Needing “a window to America,” McCullough recently started his own radio program and podcast on America Out Loud. Now he can get important medical information out quickly;   medical journals, of which he is an editor of two, are aimed at doctors and take a long time to publish. 

More Here

 

Canadian Doctor Says ‘Something Malicious is Going On’ After He’s Punished For Treating COVID Patients with Ivermectin

October 4, 2021      Debra Heine        American Greatness

A Canadian emergency room physician has been banned from practicing medicine in Alberta after he defied the province’s COVID treatment protocols by prescribing Ivermectin to three patients.

In a powerful speech last week, Dr. Daniel Nagase vented about the shoddy way COVID patients were being treated in a rural hospital in Alberta, and concluded that “something malicious is going on.”

Nagase spoke on the steps of the Vancouver Art Gallery during an event commemorating the 75th anniversary of the Nuremberg trials. The event was hosted by a nonpartisan local group called “Common Ground.” 

Nagase told American Greatness that he has been a doctor for over 15 years, and has been an emergency doctor for 10 years.  Although he lives in Vancouver, he has been working as an emergency room doctor in rural underserviced communities throughout Alberta since 2015.

In his speech Friday, the doctor shared what happened when he tried to treat three patients in a small rural hospital with Ivermectin during the weekend of September 11. He blasted doctors and surgeons “who are standing in the way of life-saving medicine.”

Nagase said that he gave his elderly patients one dose of Ivermectin, along with antibiotics, vitamins, and inhalers—which set two out of the three on a quick road to recovery. But when health authorities caught wind of what he was doing, all the medications, including the inhalers were taken away, and Nagase was relieved of his duties.

Brian Peckford, a former Premier of Newfoundland, provided the text of the doctor’s speech on his blog, Peckford42.

“Let me tell you what happened in Rimbey Alberta, a small town couple hours west of Red Deer,” Nagase said at the beginning of his speech. “It shocked me.”

I started on Saturday morning in the ER, and when it came time to round on the ward patients, the charge nurse informed me that 3 of the patients on the COVID wing had deteriorated overnight.

All the patients were on Oxygen and extremely short of breath. The only medication these patients were on were steroids—a medication that will decrease inflammation but increase the chances of a bacterial infection by suppressing the immune system. That’s right, the only medication the COVID patients at this hospital were on were immune suppressants.

One woman said it felt like we just put her in a corner to die. We weren’t doing anything for her. I told her, I can’t speak for the usual doctors during the week, but it’s the weekend, and I’ll do everything I can to help. I offered Ivermectin. She wanted to try it because she heard nothing but good things about it.

 

All 3 patients wanted to try ivermectin.

More Here

India's Ivermectin Blackout: The Secret Revealed

October 2, 2021     Tyler Durden     Life Site News

On May 7, 2021, during the peak of India's Delta Surge, The World Health Organization reported, "Uttar Pradesh (is) going the last mile to stop COVID-19."

The WHO noted, "Government teams are moving across 97,941 villages in 75 districts over five days in this activity which began May 5 in India's most populous state with a population of 230 million." 

The activity involved an aggressive house-to-house test and treat program with medicine kits.

The WHO explained, "Each monitoring team has two members who visit homes in villages and remote hamlets to test everyone with symptoms of COVID-19 using Rapid Antigen Test kits. Those who test positive are quickly isolated and given a medicine kit with advice on disease management."

The medicines comprising the kit were not identified as part of the Western media blackout at the time. As a result, the contents were as secret as the sauce at McDonald's.

The WHO continued, "On the inaugural day, WHO field officers monitored over 2,000 government teams and visited at least 10,000 households."

This news story was published on the WHO Official Website in India. The website details the WHO’s work against COVID-19 in India, including a discussion about their “Online course for Rapid Response Teams.”

Such teams are the very government teams discussed above assigned to conduct the house-to-house test and treat program in Uttar Pradesh. In discussing the role of the Rapid Response Team (RRT), the WHO site reports, 

“RRTs are a key component of a larger emergency response strategy that is essential for an efficient and effective response…WHO has produced and published this course for RRTs working at the national, sub-national, district, and sub-district levels to strengthen the pandemic response with support from the National Center for Disease Control, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, and the U.S. Centers for Disease  Control and Prevention.”

The Rapid Response Teams derive support from the United States CDC under the umbrella of the WHO. This fact further validates the Uttar Pradesh test and treat program and solidifies this as a joint effort by the WHO and CDC.

Perhaps the most telling portion of the WHO article was the last sentence, “WHO will also support the Uttar Pradesh government on the compilation of the final reports.”

None have yet been published.

Just five short weeks later, on June 14, 2021, new cases had dropped a staggering 97.1 percent, and the Uttar Pradesh program was hailed as a resounding success.

More Here

‘Truth, health, freedom’: Doctors launch global org. to provide un-biased medical advice on COVID

September 28, 2021       Dr. Mark Trozzi       Life Site News

The World Council for Health provides the latest, unbiased scientific guidance so that individuals and front-line medical professionals can make the best health decisions.

(World Council for Health) – The World Council for Health launched September 22, with a clear-cut mission to provide the latest unbiased scientific guidance as collected from around the world. This doctor-led guidance is to help the public make the best health decisions. It kicked off September 22 with a comprehensive evidence-based guide on how to manage COVID-19 at home.

The World Council for Health is an umbrella coalition, starting with 45 health-focused groups from around the world. They will provide refreshingly honest medical leadership during the covid health emergency and for many other matters of health now and into the future.

In stark contrast to the constant stream of alarming messages fed to the public by governments and other institutions, the World Council for Health offers much hope.

“There are many things that people can do to stay healthy,” said Dr. Tess Lawrie, from the U.K., who is part of the steering group for the World Council for Health.

She added, “The World Council for Health will give you the best and latest expert guidance to prevent and manage COVID-19 safely at home. By providing people with the information and treatments they need and desire to take charge of their health, the World Council for Health intends to drive out the prevailing climate of uncertainty and fear.”

The COVID treatment guide is the first of many in an ambitious plan to produce regular and authoritative guides covering a myriad of health topics. These will be easily accessible in their new website just launched.

Other members of the founding steering group explain their diverse motivations in establishing the World Council for Health as a force for good in the world.

Dr. Tracy Chandler, from New Zealand Doctors Speaking out on Science (NZDSOS), was unequivocal on the urgent need for an independent health agency.

“The World Council for Health will not be another bureaucratic organisation with big donors and private industry ties. It will be transparent and inclusive, inviting public participation and providing practical advice that respects people’s individual health choices. The World Council for Health will innovate corporate governance and transparency by holding public meetings.”

More Here

Researcher debunks every falsehood about COVID masking policies

September 27, 2021      Patrick Delaney      Life Site News

He accuses the CDC, the WHO, and Big Tech of being responsible for ‘countless deaths.’

A researcher has written a definitive, rigorously documented and easily accessible essay thoroughly dismantling the falsehoods used to justify the use of masks in the general population as a means of mitigating the spread of COVID-19.

The essay further incriminates government agencies and big tech corporations for “engaging in actions that resemble common disinformation tactics” which have led to “countless deaths.”

James D. Agresti is the president and cofounder of Just Facts, a think tank dedicated to publishing “rigorously documented facts about public policy issues.” His extensive essay provides an educational and detailed analysis of the history of the question, the gradations in strength of different types of studies, and the “cherry-picking,

censorship, muddying the waterscitation bluffsnon-sequiturs, half-truths, and outright falsehoods” used by government agencies, media and big tech corporations to advance deadly policies.

When asked what inspired him to put “more than 500 hours of research” into writing this condensed, yet lengthy, piece of work, Agresti told LifeSiteNews, “We cover subjects that are in the news and we feel have not been adequately addressed by the media, government agencies and other organizations. So, we typically step into the fray when we feel there is a dire need for factual information. And this is a perfect example of it.”

Agresti’s research includes a lengthy demonstration, using direct quotes from multiple linked studies, illustrating how government agencies like the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) disregarded evidence that COVID-19 is spread by airborne aerosols, and instead promoted the claim that transmission comes primarily through large droplets.

This is relevant since such droplets are “bigger than the pore sizes of most masks and only remain airborne for a few seconds,” suggesting a level of effectiveness for the use of masks in mitigating transmission of the virus. But since COVID-19 is primarily spread by “microscopic aerosols that remain airborne for minutes or hours,” easily penetrating common masks, traveling freely through gaps around their edges, the best studies have confirmed “no statistically significant benefits” for the use of masks “in community settings,” and only “inconsistent benefits” of N95 masks in healthcare settings.

More Here

4,200 physicians, scientists sign declaration for early treatment of COVID-19, against gov’t intrusion

September 27, 2021     Maike Hickson       Life Site News

This text defends physicians' right to treat corona patients with the best knowledge of early treatments and against aggressive intrusion by governmental entities.

(LifeSiteNews) — Earlier this month a physicians’ and medical scientists’ declaration was written by a team under the leadership of Dr. Robert Malone, the main inventor of the mRNA technology and a strong critic of the current official response to COVID-19. This text, which defends physicians’ right to treat corona patients with the best knowledge of early treatments and against  aggressive intrusion by governmental entities, has now gained 4,200 signatures from other physicians and medical scientists.

Speaking about the official suppression of early treatments of COVID-19, this declaration states: “This is not medicine. This is not care. These policies may actually constitute crimes against humanity.”

As LifeSite reported, Dr. Malone originally met with a group of physicians in Puerto Rico to author such a declaration. Dr. Heather Gessling and Dr. Ryan Cole were among the physicians who met in San Juan, Puerto Rico, in early September.

In a video, several of the participants of that smaller gathering speak up, among them Dr. Malone and Dr. Cole, as well as Dr. Pierre Kory. Many of these physicians are known for their courageous stance during this corona crisis in favor of truth and against the ongoing manipulations by the government and the media.

Dr. Malone subsequently read the same declaration to an audience at the 12-14 September 2021 International Covid Summit in Rome. The Summit participants also adopted this text, hence its title “Rome Declaration.”

More Here

The emperor has no clothes: COVID math simply doesn’t add up

September 24, 2021      Children's Health Defense      Life Site News

Eighteen months of COVID-related health data show the numbers promulgated by public health officials and mainstream media vastly overstate the risk of COVID and downplay the risk of vaccines.

 From the beginning of the series of events branded as a global health emergency, many people have smelled a rat.

 

Whether one looks at leaders’ willingness to engage in wanton economic destruction, or the rapidity with which billionaires have amassed new wealth or the multisectoral efforts to link and mine people’s intimate data, it is not hard to recognize that something much larger than a health crisis is afoot.

However, even if one restricts oneself to the narrow confines of the health narrative, 18 months of data — emerging in spite of ferocious censorship — have repeatedly illustrated that the official story is full of lies and omissions.

One of the biggest holes in the story is the trail of destruction that the experimental COVID vaccines are leaving in their wake, with hundreds of thousands of reported injuries in the U.S. alone and, according to some statisticians, as many as 150,000 dead Americans, following the injection.

With this level of damage after just nine months, now is as good a time as any to reexamine “COVID math” and highlight some of the embedded falsehoods that cast serious doubt on official and corporate pronouncements about risks and benefits.

The false case for vaccinating kids

Pfizer’s CEO, veterinarian Albert Bourla, is currently drumming up buzz in anticipation of a likely decision by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to green-light emergency use of his company’s COVID vaccine in children ages 5-11. To buttress his arguments, Bourla claims that pediatric COVID cases are on the rise.

However, setting aside the questionable PCR testing methodology being used to identify these “cases” (that is, until the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) retires the PCR test at the end of the year), recent studies show reported COVID-19 hospitalizations — “one of the primary metrics for tracking the severity of the coronavirus pandemic” — have been grossly inflated for children. In actuality, pediatric COVID hospitalization rates are “vanishingly small.”

One fact, especially, bears repeating: Through age 19, children and adolescents have a 99.9973% COVID-19 survival rate. This information, which has been a constant throughout the reported pandemic, is reiterated in the most recent analyses by Stanford physician, epidemiologist and statistician John Ioannidis, who has been a steadfast critic of COVID alarmism from the very beginning.

And Ioannidis’s good news does not stop with the 19-and-unders. Until people hit their seventies, all age groups have survival rates well over 99%:

  • 0-19: 99.9973%

  • 20-29: 99.986%

  • 30-39: 99.969%

  • 40-49: 99.918%

  • 50-59: 99.73%

  • 60-69: 99.41%

  • 70+: 97.6% (non-institutionalized)

  • 70+: 94.5% (institutionalized and non-institutionalized)

As Off-Guardian’s Kit Knightly wrote about another Ioannidis study this past spring, “With every new study, with every new paper, the ‘deadly’ pandemic gets less and less, well, deadly.”

At that time, Ioannidis ascertained that the global infection fatality rate was 95% lower than the one disseminated by the World Health Organization (WHO).

More Here

American Medical Association instructs doctors to use language swaps, push jabs in ‘COVID-19 messaging guide’

September 23, 2021     Dr. Joseph Mercola         Life Site News

Among the instructions from the AMA to doctors, is the note to change the words 'hospitalization rates' to 'deaths,' two terms that are not even remotely interchangeable.

Story at a Glance

  • The Winter 2021 “AMA COVID-19 Guide: Background/Messaging on Vaccines, Vaccine Clinical Trials & Combatting Vaccine Misinformation,” issued by the American Medical Association raises serious questions about the AMA’s adherence to transparency, honesty, ethics and the moral standards to which it will hold its members

  • The guide lists nine “key messages” the AMA wants doctors to focus on when communicating about COVID-19. This includes stressing the importance of eliminating nonmedical vaccine exemptions, the importance of flu vaccines and COVID shots, and expressing confidence in vaccine development

  • In the guide, the AMA instructs doctors on how to disinform the public using psychological and linguistic tools. This includes explicit instructions on which words to swap for other more narrative-affirming choices

  • Word swaps include changing “hospitalization rates” to “deaths,” two terms that are not even remotely interchangeable

  • Swapping the term “Operation Warp Speed” for “standard process” is another rather egregious misdirection. The two are not interchangeable. In fact, they’re diametrically opposed to one another

(Mercola) – The Winter 2021 “AMA COVID-19 Guide: Background/Messaging on Vaccines, Vaccine Clinical Trials & Combatting Vaccine Misinformation,” issued by the American Medical Association (AMA) raises serious questions about the AMA’s adherence to transparency, honesty, ethics and the moral standards to which it will hold its members.

The AMA was founded in 1847 and is the largest professional association and lobbying group of physicians and medical students in the U.S. According to the AMA itself, its mission is to promote the art and science of medicine and the betterment of public health.

How then do they explain this “COVID-19 messaging guide,” which explicitly teaches doctors how to deceive their patients and the media when asked tough questions about COVID-19, treatment options and COVID shots?

AMA teaches doctors how to deceive

“It is critical that physicians and patients have confidence in the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines as they become available for public use,” the “AMA COVID-19 Guide” states, adding:

“To overcome vaccine hesitancy and ensure widespread vaccine acceptance among all demographic groups, physicians and the broader public health community must continue working to build trust in vaccine safety and efficacy, especially in marginalized and minoritized communities with historically well-founded mistrust in medical institutions.”

Indeed, the entire guide is aimed at teaching doctors how to foster confidence in the medical profession in general, as it pertains to treatment of COVID-19, but in particular as it pertains to the experimental COVID shots.

The guide provides “suggested narratives” for various engagements, such as when communicating on social media, as sell as “talking points to guide external communications,” such as when being interviewed. It lists nine specific “key messages” that they want doctors to focus on when communicating about COVID-19. These key messages can be summarized as follows:

  • Express confidence in vaccine development

  • Stress the importance of vaccines

  • Highlight the need to combat the spread of vaccine misinformation

  • Adhere to updated ethical guidance for physicians and medical personnel, which says they have a moral obligation to get vaccinated themselves

  • Give general vaccine recommendations, such as the recommendation for everyone over the age of 6 months, including pregnant women, to get an annual flu shot

  • Stress the importance of eliminating nonmedical vaccine exemptions

  • Highlight the increased availability of flu vaccines, and the importance of getting a flu shot even if you’ve gotten a COVID injection

  • Highlight the importance of including minorities, both in vaccine trials and as trusted messengers who can “promote social pressure” to get minorities vaccinated and dispel historical distrust in medical institutions

  • Denounce scientific analyses “predicated on personal opinions, anecdote and political ideologies”

More Here

UPDATE: Husband & father dies after being denied ivermectin by hospital

September 22, 2021       Tim Jackson        Life Site News

‘It brings me unbearable sadness to let you know that my sweet, kind, hardworking husband passed away,’ Melissa Abbott told LifeSiteNews.

An Alabama man whose doctor dismissed pleas that he be given ivermectin died just nine days after being admitted to hospital with COVID-19.

 

Todd Abbott, 43, died Friday at UAB Medical Center West in Bessemer, Alabama, after doctors refused to honor several appeals by his wife to have ivermectin administered to him. Abbott, a father of two teenage daughters, was later transferred to intensive care and put under sedation while on a ventilator.

Tragically, the man’s condition worsened as his kidneys shut down, fluid built up in his lungs and a blood clot developed in his leg.

Melissa Abbott, Todd’s wife of 19 years, is now left to pick up the pieces after losing her husband in such devastating circumstances.

“I’ve never felt so much pain. My heart is breaking into pieces. The joy has been ripped from my life,” Melissa told LifeSiteNews. “So now, I’m supposed to know how to move on and raise our teen daughters at such a precious age for a father to be around …”

Melissa did everything possible to have other treatments such as ivermectin given to her husband, even engaging a law firm to persuade the hospital to take action, but from the outset she felt the doctor treating Todd “spoke disrespectfully” and dismissively to her.

“I also have overwhelming anger for the medical system and the doctor who treated my husband and, up to the day he died, still refused to give him the Ivermectin and told me he wasn’t going to discuss it,” she explained.

Help this widow support her children & take legal action: www.lifefunder.com/ivermectin

Melissa had told LifeSiteNews last week, before her husband’s death, that she felt “like a prisoner” and that the doctors were “the wardens” due to their refusal to administer ivermectin to her COVID-stricken husband.

The bereaved mother now plans to seek further legal help in trying to ensure doctors at the hospital learn from her husband’s death, so that no other family has to experience the loss the Abbott family has.

“The night before, my husband had been doing pretty good and his stats were looking good … the next morning they said his lung had collapsed, his heart rate dropped and his oxygen was at 50-60%,” she told LifeSiteNews. “I went to say my goodbyes with my father-in-law and brother-in-law … I didn’t want our daughters to see him in the state he was in … it’s the worst thing to ever endure. I was with him when he passed away.”

“The doctor was always very grim and seemed to feed off of giving me the worst news … every time I asked about trying the ivermectin he would immediately shoot it down, saying we weren’t going to talk about it, like he had all the rights to my husband’s health,” she continued. “I am looking into my options for legal rights in regards to my husband’s health care or actually lack thereof.”

More here

Medical associations back stripping licenses from doctors who warn against COVID-19 jabs

September 20, 2021       Jack Bingham      Life Site News

The American Board of Pediatrics, American Board of Family Medicine, and American Board of Internal Medicine support the Federation of State Medical Boards’ decision that all boards should revoke or suspend the license and certification of doctors who question the safety of the experimental COVID-19 jabs. 

WASHINGTON, D.C. (LifeSiteNews) – Three professional medical associations have backed a bid to strip doctors who speak out against the novel COVID-19 inoculations of their ability to practice medicine.

 

On Thursday, September 9, the American Board of Pediatrics, the American Board of Family Medicine, and the American Board of Internal Medicine released a joint statement supporting the Federation of State Medical Boards’ (FSMB) July 29 decision that all boards should revoke or suspend the license and certification of doctors who question the safety of the experimental COVID-19 jabs. 

“We at the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM), the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM), and the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) support FSMB’s position. We also want all physicians certified by our Boards to know that such unethical or unprofessional conduct may prompt their respective Board to take action that could put their certification at risk,” the three boards wrote in their statement.  

The Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) – a national organization representing all American medical boards that license and discipline physicians, including the ABFM, ABIM, and ABP, released their now supported position in a statement published on July 29

“Physicians who generate and spread COVID-19 vaccine misinformation or disinformation are risking disciplinary action by state medical boards, including the suspension or revocation of their medical license,” reads the FSMB’s release.

 

“Due to their specialized knowledge and training, licensed physicians possess a high degree of public trust and therefore have a powerful platform in society, whether they recognize it or not. They also have an ethical and professional responsibility to practice medicine in the best interests of their patients and must share information that is factual, scientifically grounded and consensus-driven for the betterment of public health,” they added. 

According to the FSMB the new disciplinary directives are necessary because of the “dramatic increase” of physicians disseminating “COVID-19 vaccine misinformation.” 

“Consensus-driven” science, as mentioned in the statement, is at odds with the scientific method, which encourages debate and dissenting evidence as a way of discovering objective scientific truth. 

More Here

CDC redefines ‘vaccine’ in wake of mRNA jab’s plunging efficacy

 

September 15, 2021     David McLoone       Life Site News

 

The key word is no longer ‘immunity,’ but ‘protection.’

WASHINGTON (LifeSiteNews) — The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) quietly updated its definition of “vaccine” and “vaccination” on September 1 from providing “immunity” to merely providing “protection.”

Between 2015 and August 2021, the CDC had defined a vaccine as “[a] product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.”

 

But following increasing skepticism over the term “vaccine” being applied to the newly developed mRNA jabs against COVID-19 from experts in medicine, the CDC adjusted the definition at the beginning of September, now describing a vaccine as “[a] preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”

Similarly, the word “vaccinating” is now, according to the CDC’s definition, less specific about the level of resistance a subject should receive from the medication.

Between 2015 and August 2021, the definition of vaccination provided by the CDC was “[t]he act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.” Now, the word “immunity” has been dropped in favor of the less precise term “protection” to define vaccination as “[t]he act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease.”

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) highlighted on Twitter that the term “vaccination” had undergone a definitional overhaul already in 2015. Previously, the CDC had described vaccination more specifically as an “injection of a killed or weakened infectious organism in order to prevent the disease” the shot was designed to protect against.

 

Massie commented on the changing definition of “vaccination” over the years, comparing the CDC’s work with that of the ministry of truth from George Orwell’s 1984.

Investigative reporter and New York Times bestselling author Sharyl Attkisson also commented on the change. She noted that it was only after COVID-19 jabs were introduced, “and it was discovered they do not necessarily ‘prevent disease’ or ‘provide immunity,’” that “the CDC altered the definition of vaccines again to say that they merely ‘produce protection.’”

Corroborating Attkisson’s claim that the COVID shots are failing to provide the immunity originally promised by their manufacturers is renowned cardiologist and chief medical adviser to the Truth for Health Foundation Dr. Peter McCullough, M.D.

In an interview with vaccine injury lawyer Robert F. Kennedy Jr., McCullough highlighted research conducted by the Oxford University Clinical Research Group and published August 10 in The Lancet which found that individuals “vaccinated” against COVID were carrying 251 times the viral load of those who had not received one of the experimental shots.

“This group had actually calculated viral load from oral and nasal secretions in the past. The viral load was 251 times that of the previous unvaccinated era where they had used the same methodology,” McCullough said. “They had previous workers and patients who had COVID-19 before any exposure to the vaccines. And now the vaccinated were carrying a massive viral load and passing it to one another.”

Accordingly, the physician noted that the “vaccinated” are more susceptible to the Delta variant of the virus and that the attending efficacy of the jabs is “far below the 50% regulatory standard to even have a vaccine on the market.”

“The vaccines are failing,” he added.

More Here

HUGE: Uttar Pradesh, India Announces State Is COVID-19 Free Proving the Effectiveness of “Deworming Drug” IVERMECTIN

September 15, 2021     Jim Hoft         The Gateway Pundit

The Gateway Pundit previously reported that COVID cases are plummeting in India thanks to new rules that promote Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine to its massive population. The 33 districts in Uttar Pradesh, India have now become free from COVID-19 government informed on Friday. The recovery rate has increased up to 98.7% proving the effectiveness of IVERMECTIN as part of the “Uttar Pradesh Covid Control Model.”

This state has an estimated population of 241 million people in 2021 and has the highest population in India.  This is almost two-thirds of the United States population in 2021 and yet it is now a COVID-19 free nation.

So what could the United States be doing wrong? Let’s ask Dr. Fauci.

Hindustan Times reported on this big development:

Overall, the state has a total of 199 active cases, while the positivity rate came down to less than 0.01 per cent. The recovery rate, meanwhile, has improved to 98.7 per cent. As per the state’s health bulletin, Uttar Pradesh reported only 11 new Covid-19 cases and zero deaths in the last 24 hours.

More Here

Idaho doctor reports a ‘20 times increase’ of cancer in vaccinated patients 

September 13, 2021          Jack Bingham       Life Site News

'Post-vaccine, what we are seeing is a drop in your killer T-cells, in your CD8 cells,” said Dr. Ryan Cole.  

BOISE, Idaho  (LifeSiteNews) — A doctor has found an increase in cancers since the COVID-19 inoculation rollout. 

On March 18, Dr. Ryan Cole, a board-certified pathologist and owner and operator of a diagnostics lab, reported to the public in a video produced by Idaho state government’s  “Capitol Clarity” project,  that he is seeing a massive ‘uptick’ in various autoimmune diseases and cancers in patients who have been vaccinated.  

BOISE, Idaho  (LifeSiteNews) — A doctor has found an increase in cancers since the COVID-19 inoculation rollout. 

On March 18, Dr. Ryan Cole, a board-certified pathologist and owner and operator of a diagnostics lab, reported to the public in a video produced by Idaho state government’s  “Capitol Clarity” project,  that he is seeing a massive ‘uptick’ in various autoimmune diseases and cancers in patients who have been vaccinated.  


“Since January 1, in the laboratory, I’m seeing a 20 times increase of endometrial cancers over what I see on an annual basis,” reported Dr. Cole in the video clip shared on Twitter.  

“I’m not exaggerating at all because I look at my numbers year over year, I’m like ‘Gosh, I’ve never seen this many endometrial cancers before’,” he continued.  

Explaining his findings at the March 18 event, Cole told Idahoans that the vaccines seem to be causing serious autoimmune issues, in a way he described as a “reverse HIV” response. 

Cole explained that two types of cells are required for adequate immune system function: “Helper T-cells,” also called “CD4 cells,” and “killer T-cells,” often known as “CD8 cells.”

 

According to Cole, in patients with HIV, there is a massive suppression of “helper T-cells” which cause immune system functions to plummet, and leave the patient susceptible to a variety of illnesses. 

 

Similarly, Cole describes, “post-vaccine, what we are seeing is a drop in your killer T-cells, in your CD8 cells,” 

“And what do CD8 cells do? They keep all other viruses in check,” he continued. 

Much like HIV causes immune system disruption by suppressing CD4 “helper” cells, the same thing happens when CD8 “killer” cells are suppressed. In Dr. Cole’s expert view, this is what seems to be the case with the COVID-19 jabs. 

 

Cole goes on to state that as a result of this vaccine-induced “killer T-cell” suppression, he is seeing an “uptick” of not only endometrial cancer, but also melanomas, as well as herpes, shingles, mono, and a “huge uptick” in HPV when “looking at the cervical biopsies of women.”  

More Here

New doctors’ group Pandemic Health Alliance argues for early treatment to fight COVID-19

September 13, 2021          Maike Hickson         Life Site News

Instead of pointing to the vaccine as the most effective way to prevent death and disease, these medical doctors stress the importance of treating the virus early on, using effective medications such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.

(LifeSiteNews) — A newly formed group of physicians, the Pandemic Health Alliance insists on alternative ways of treating COVID-19. Instead of pointing to the vaccine as the most effective way to prevent death and disease, these medical doctors stress the importance of treating the virus early on, using effective medications such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.

Speaking with Steve Bannon, host of “War Room: Pandemic,” Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Heather Gessling, and Dr. Ryan Cole explained that some 15 physicians met a few days ago in San Juan, Puerto Rico, to discuss their experiences with early treatment and with different early treatment protocols, as well as writing a manifesto. Malone is the president of this new Pandemic Health Alliance. Gessling successfully treated about 1,500 patients with COVID-19, none of whom died.

She is the group’s medical director. Cole is the director of research.

“We are here not to discuss the vaccine,” explained Malone, the original inventor of the mRNA technology. Instead they came together to defend “the freedom of physicians to practice.” Doctors are “being prevented from providing early treatments,” he said, referring to pharmacies blocking certain prescriptions. “We are in a situation where the government has seized control of the medical profession and this is causing death,” Malone continued.

Gessling later in the show explained that the doctors had “incredible success” with early treatment protocols “that have already been tried and have [been] found to work very well.” She said the world is dealing with a “pandemic of censorship” regarding ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. “We are being shut down,” Gessling added. “We cannot even tell people what has worked.”

The Pandemic Health Alliance’s manifesto says the doctors wish to strengthen the doctor-patient-relationship. “The profession of medicine as we know is at a crossroad,” the manifesto reads. “There has been an unprecedented and intentional assault on our ability to care for our patients. Physicians, and all health care providers, must have the freedom to practice the art and science of medicine without fear of retribution, censorship, slander, and disciplinary action to include possible loss of licensure and hospital privileges, loss of insurance contracts and interference from government entities and organizations — all further preventing us from caring for patients in need.”

The manifesto laments that patients in Europe are being blocked from going to their physicians, unless they take the “high risk, duplicative vaccine.” And this takes place even if patients already acquired natural immunity.

The manifesto insists that the blocking of early treatments that is taking place right now in the United States is “sentencing high risk patients to death.”

More Here

Head of Tokyo Medical Association recommends ivermectin for COVID treatment

September 12, 2021      Howard Richman        American Thinker

Dr. Haruo Ozaki, chairman of the Tokyo Medical Association recommends ivermectin for use with COVID patients. He notes that the parts of Africa that use ivermectin to control parasites have a COVID death rate of just 2.2 per 100,000 population, as compared to 13 times that death rate among African countries that do not use ivermectin. Similarly, worldometer.com statistics say that the COVID death rate in India (which uses HCQ and Ivermectin to treat COVID) is 32 while the COVID death rate in the U.S.A. is 6.5 times higher at 205 per 100,000 population.

If these stats are accurate, then at least 6 of every 7 people who have died in the U.S. of COVID could be alive today had they been treated with ivermectin. Of course, ivermectin's effectiveness against COVID was not yet known when the first COVID wave hit the United States. Also, U.S. health statistics are notoriously inaccurate. Hospitals are given a financial incentive to identify almost everyone who dies with COVID as having died of COVID. Also, the first wave of COVID that hit the U.S. before Africa and India was much more deadly than recent waves, simply because deadly viruses keep mutating into forms that spread more readily partly because they are less symptomatic and deadly

In recent months, a growing number of American physicians have discovered that Ivermectin works. But, according to The Last Refuge, President Biden's Department of Health and Human Services is taking steps, through the liability insurance system, to suppress the issuance of ivermectin prescriptions. Australia’s federal government has just banned physicians there from prescribing ivermectin to treat COVID.

More here

 

COVID-19 jabs are ‘not really vaccines’: top infectious diseases expert

September 3, 2021      Peter Levinson       Life Site News

The world-class expert, censured and censored for his support for COVID-19 treatments, described how the pandemic should be managed.

PARIS, France (LifeSiteNews) – A prominent French scientist with extensive expertise in infectious diseases has called the COVID-19 vaccines “dangerous” and stated that they “are not really vaccines.”

In an interview he gave to British news organization UK Column, Professor Christian Perronne also called the international government-led vaccination campaign “a great mistake.”

Perronne is one of France’s foremost expert on infectious diseases. Until recently, he was the head of the Medical Department for Infectious Diseases at Raymond Point Carré hospital in Garches, a post he held from early 1994. Raymond Point Carré hospital is the teaching hospital for the University of Versailles-St Quentin near Paris. Perronne is also a fellow at Institut Pasteur, a world-renowned biomedical research center.

  

The professor is by no means anti-vaccine; he has been involved in France’s vaccination policy for many years.  Perronne has served as chairman of such important French health committees as the National Consultation Group on Vaccination or Technical Committee on Vaccination (CTV) and HSCP the French High Council on Public Health, the Infectious and Tropical Diseases Teaching College (CMIT), the Infectious Diseases Federation (FFI, which he co-founded), and the National Medical and Healthcare products Safety Agency (ANSM). ANSM examines the health risks of medicines and is France’s only regulator of biomedical research. Perronne was also on the Scientific Council of the French Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research Institute (IMMI/INSERM) until 2013.

  

On the international level, Perronne has served as Vice President of the European Advisory Group to the World Health Organization. 

But in spite of his many years of service in the French healthcare sector and his infectious diseases expertise, Perronne was dismissed as head of the Medical Department for Infectious Diseases at Raymond Pointcarré hospital following a number of statements he made in defense of hydroxychloroquine and for criticizing the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic. His critique included the vaccination campaign.

  

Perronne has also been the victim of censure and censorship by the French media, who paint him as a conspiracy theorist. His reputation has been badly damaged by these attacks, and he has been ostracized and discredited by his former colleagues. The French medical elite are working hand in glove with pharmaceutical lobbies and have aligned themselves with the official policy of the French government on the management of the COVID-19 crisis.  

The danger of the vaccines 

Perronne began the interview by insisting that he is not against vaccines as such.

  

“I am not anti-vaccine because I wrote the vaccination policy for France for a great many years,” he told UK Column’s chief editor Brian Gerrish.

“The problem is that the products they call ‘vaccines’ for Covid-19 are not really vaccines.” 

More Here

Why all the fuss about Ivermectin?

September 3, 2021      Brian C. Joondeph       American Thinker

First hydroxychloroquine, now ivermectin, is the hated deadly drug de jour, castigated by the medical establishment and regulatory authorities. Both drugs have been around for a long time as FDA-approved prescription medications. Yet now we are told they are as deadly as arsenic.

As a physician, I am certainly aware of ivermectin but don’t recall ever writing a prescription for it in my 30+ years’ medical career. Ivermectin is an anthelmintic, meaning it cures parasitic infections. In my world of ophthalmology, it is used on occasion for rare parasitic or worm infections in the eye.

Ivermectin was FDA approved in 1998 under the brand name Stromectol, produced by pharmaceutical giant Merck, approved for several parasitic infections. The product label described it as having a “unique mode of action,” which “leads to an increase in the permeability of the cell membrane to chloride ions.” This suggests that ivermectin acts as an ionophore, making cell membranes permeable to ions that enter the cell for therapeutic effect.

Ivermectin is one of several ionophores, others including hydroxychloroquine, quercetin, and resveratrol, the latter two available over the counter. These ionophores simply open a cellular door, allowing zinc to enter the cell, where it then interferes with viral replication, providing potential therapeutic benefit in viral and other infections.

This scientific paper reviews and references other studies demonstrating antibacterial, antiviral, and anticancer properties of ivermectin. This explains the interest in this drug as having potential use in treating COVID.

More Here

25 reasons to ban vaccine passports

August 31, 2021  Aaron Rock      Life Site News

Vaccine passports should be rejected as nearsighted and dangerous. While everyone from totalitarian opportunists, to angry vaccinated people who are tired of lockdowns, to worn-down ICU staff who are weary of being overworked, may applaud such passports as the responsible thing to do, citizens and officials should reject them outright. 

(Pursuit of Glory) ­– No one can predict the future, but we can learn much from history that will help us navigate the present. History has shown that awarding governments with totalitarian power over people leads to bad outcomes; and, if those decisions are predicated on fear, near-sightedness, or occur during a crisis, the consequences are often grave. In a rush to avoid COVID-19, we have witnessed many irrational, contradictory, and even destructive decisions made by elected officials but perhaps none more dangerous than vaccine passports (VPs). Already issued in places like Quebec, Canada, and Paris, France, vaccine passports are used to limit travel and bar the unvaccinated from numerous businesses, services and employment. Universities are beginning to require vaccine passports for students enrolled in their programs. The Canadian federal government has also announced that it is developing a VP for international travel, and possibly for domestic use. While everyone from totalitarian opportunists, to angry vaccinated people who are tired of lockdowns, to worn-down ICU staff who are weary of being overworked, may applaud VPs as the responsible thing to do, citizens and officials should reject them outright.

25 Reasons to reject vaccine passports

Vaccine passport programs are dangerous because:

  1. The government takes on the role of physician: Mandatory VPs deny family doctors the ability to individually assess patient health and offer medical recommendations unique to each patient. Why should the government have greater say over personal health than our own physicians? As with viruses, vaccines impact each person’s biology and body type differently, and pose unique risks.

  2. Medicine is blended with politics: VPs grant control over our health to medically untrained elected officials and government-employed physicians, none of whom are immune to political pressure. Unlike dictatorial governments, no Western national government has ever resorted to such invasive totalitarian controls, and this should concern us. Do we really want to wed medical procedures to re-election campaigns and party politics?

  3. Manufacturer liability is dismissed: Once mandated, citizens will have no legal recourse to hold governments or vaccine producers accountable for potential side effects. And, how can the consumer trust the quality of future products or know that adequate testing has been performed when the government has already guaranteed manufacturers the sale of their vaccines?

More Here

Physicians respond to media, Big Pharma attacks on cheap, effective treatments for COVID-19

 

August 31, 2021   America's Frontline Doctors       Life Site News

 

'America's Frontline Doctors has been maliciously attacked as part of an ongoing, orchestrated effort by media outlets who are making billions from Big Pharma and pandemic-related government advertising.'

When COVID-19 hit in March 2020, the formal recommendation from the United States government was to lock down and only come to the hospital if you could not breathe. Never before in the history of our nation has this been medical advice. Over the past 18 months, the government has contended that there is nothing that can be done other than masking to protect individuals from COVID-19. The human cost of that reckless and unscientific prescription has been massive. This has been attested to by thousands of doctors worldwide including several testifying before Congress.

 

A small number of courageous physicians in the U.S. and around the world put their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor on the line, and started treating COVID patients early to prevent hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, and death.

These intrepid doctors, including Dr. Vladimir Zelenko in upstate New York, Dr. Brian Tyson in California, and Dr. Didier Raoult in Marseilles, France, achieved extremely impressive clinical results, using various combinations of hydroxycholoroquine, ivermectin, zinc, vitamins and antibiotics.

AFLDS was formed in response to the unprecedented media censorship of early outpatient treatment of COVID-19 with cheap, easily available drugs. We responded to the enormous humanitarian need by aggressively working to make hydroxychloroquine over the counter, just as it is in many other countries. A Citizen’s Petition was filed with the FDA on October 12, 2020 and was ignored, and thus AFLDS worked to establish relationships with telemedicine companies to enable physicians to see patients virtually. Several other organizations stepped into this void as well and together with qualified physicians appropriately prescribing these proven, safe and effective medications, have saved millions of lives.

Globally it is well known that early treatment works but this truth continues to be frantically suppressed by the dishonest American media. In India the scientist who withheld this cheap, safe medicine from her people is now facing the death penalty. In Japan the Tokyo Medical Association urged all doctors to prescribe ivermectin. In China Chloroquine has been recommended since March 2020. In America the mainstream media failed to report >300 studies showing early treatment works, including the American Journal of Medicine and the American Journal of Therapeutics and the treatment algorithm posted by Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. The Wall Street Journal did attempt to shame the FDA for trying to block people’s access to the Nobel Prize winning drug.

More Here

   

 

2,000 healthcare workers sue Maine gov. to block vaccine mandate

August 27, 2021     Joseph Summers      Life Site News

‘All Plaintiffs seek in this lawsuit is to be able to continue to provide the health care they have provided to patients for their entire careers.’

BANGOR, Maine (LifeSiteNews) – Liberty Counsel has filed a lawsuit representing over 2,000 Maine healthcare workers to fight a measure that requires all health care workers in the state of Maine to receive full COVID-19 vaccination.

  

The brief states that “All Plaintiffs seek in this lawsuit is to be able to continue to provide the health care they have provided to patients for their entire careers, and to do so under the same protective measures that have sufficed for them to be considered superheroes for the last 18 months.”  

 

The brief also asks a federal judge in Bangor to impose a temporary order that would stop the measure from taking effect. The mandate comes on the heels of the implementation of a law passed in 2019 that prohibits religious exemptions from vaccination. 

Named as plaintiffs in the lawsuit are Janet T. Mills (D-ME), governor of Maine, officials from the Maine Department of Health and Human Services, Maine Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and five major hospital systems in Maine. 

Liberty Counsel contends that the mandate violates, in addition to the First Amendment, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which states that religious exemptions and accommodations should always be met by employers. 

More Here

 

‘The Nuremberg Code has been violated’: Prominent medical expert blasts FDAs approval of Pfizer COVID jab

August 26, 2021     David McLoone    Life Site News

'If in running the safety portion of the trial, we see that the risks are way greater than the benefits, then that's a problem,' Dr. Paul Alexander said. 'And in that case, the trial has to be stopped.' 

Thu Aug 26, 2021 - 3:26 pm EDT

(LifeSiteNews) – A former adviser to COVID Pandemic policy for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) criticized the U.S. government Thursday for circumventing due diligence in its approval of the vaccines against COVID-19, stating that “it is actually incomprehensible what has been done right now.”

Dr. Paul E. Alexander is a former faculty member at McMaster University in Canada and now serves as Director of Evidence-Based Medicine and Research Methodology for the Truth for Health Foundation. He also leads the newly formed “citizens’ data safety advisory committee” on the COVID jabs, launched by the Truth for Health Foundation during its most recent “Stop the Shot” conference, which aired Thursday at LifeSiteNews.

Speaking at the conference, Alexander criticized the method and timescale under which the COVID shots have been approved and rolled out to the general public. “Normally vaccines take anywhere from about 8 to 10 to 12 to as much as 15 years from conception” before being produced en masse, Alexander said. “But we have a situation right now where we have these vaccine developers in conjunction with the FDA and NIH and CDC, to an extent that they have brought vaccines to the public in three to four months.”

“This is a real problem,” Alexander noted, owing to the lack of time-tested information regarding the efficacy of the jabs. Moreover, the research scientist warned against simply counting on the efficacy of a drug to prove its usefulness and safety. In fact, he said that it is “maybe more important” to consider “evidence of harm, and if those harms, those risks supersede the benefits, then that medical device, that drug, that vaccine, cannot be brought to market […] That trial has to be stopped.”

When the FDA approves a drug or vaccine, they are confirming that the benefits of the medicine outweigh any risks involved in taking the drug, Alexander explained. He added that some risks are considered acceptable, as they are not life-altering, and that some should even be expected. Soreness at the site of injection and a slight fever are modest risks, he said.

More Here

10 reasons why the FDA approval for Pfizer jab isn’t about health, but about forcing people to take the shot

August 24, 2021   Life Site News

The fact is, Pfizer’s clinical trials don’t end until May 2023.

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here. 

(LifeSiteNews) — The announcement yesterday by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that it has granted full approval to Pfizer for its Covid-19 vaccine is not surprising to many people who have been watching all of the Operation Warp Speed fast-tracking, moving of barriers, and rule-bending for vaccine makers. Here are 10 reasons why the FDA “gold standard” stamp of approval doesn’t mean anything about protecting citizens’ health and safety but has everything to do with erasing liability and giving governments and businesses the gumption to coerce injections on employees and consumers.

1.It's still experimental - Pfizer's clinical trials don't end until May 2023.

 

Some people think that the FDA approval means that Pfizer’s shot is no longer experimental. That’s not the case. Every Covid shot, including Pfizer’s, is less than a year in use and still experimental by definition. Pfizer’s vaccine, like Moderna’s is based on a “novel” experiment using messenger RNA that hijacks human cell machinery to produce spike antibodies. There’s never been anything like it used in humans before and this vaccine rollout is a giant experiment – whether you call it that or not.

The fact is, Pfizer’s clinical trials don’t end until May 2023. FDA-approval usually requires letting clinical trials run their course but granting an emergency use authorization (EUA) – the sort of thing that allows doctors to try experimental drugs on a patient because he is dying anyway — is a different game altogether. And Pfizer’s EUA extends to 12-year-olds whose odds of dying from Covid are significantly less than getting hit by lightning.

More questions are emerging everyday about what the long-term effects of the Pfizer Covid jab will be on the immune system, on Covid, on chronic disease, on fertility, and so on. Given that no-one knows the answers to these questions the jab is obviously still experimental.

2. COVID jab mandates violate fundamental human rights

When some people hear that an injection is still experimental, they pause. Some might hesitate to issue vaccine mandates because it would be in violation of the Nuremberg Code. After the horrific atrocities of Nazi experiments on Jews in World War II were exposed, the world accepted the Nuremberg Code which said that we as humanity would never, ever coerce people into medical experiments against their will again.

Some people don’t want to break codes like that. The EUA status itself forbids mandates. But “approval” doesn’t.  So Joe Biden and Anthony Fauci’s gangs didn’t advertise that the shots were experimental and now they’ve just changed the process to make something experimental sound not-so-experimental.

3. There’s a history of medical disasters to consider

Many people still remember medical horrors like Thalidomide and DES – experimental drugs that doctors cavalierly doled out like bubble gum until thousands of babies started being born with malformed limbs and young girls started getting rare vaginal cancer years and years after they were exposed to the experiment.

There have been disasters with vaccines in the past, too. A vaccine for the swine flu pandemic of the 1970s is a considered a public health debacle because hundreds of people developed the neurologically disabling condition, Guillain Barré Syndrome.

The lessons of medical hubris in history are forgotten quickly though, and another  2009 experimental swine flu pandemic vaccine led to more than 1,400 documented cases of narcolepsy – a devastating brain disorder that causes its victims to collapse into sleep multiple times throughout the day – mostly among children.

In 2017, Sanofi Pasteur was forced to yank its new Dengvaxia vaccine off the market after it killed several hundred children by making them experience a worse version of dengue fever than if they’d never been vaccinated at all. The Dengvaxia fiasco led to dozens of public health figures being indicted for “reckless imprudence resulting in homicide.” Do you think that can’t happen again?

More Here

Former Pfizer VP: COVID vaccines pose ‘severe risk’ of infertility for women

August 19, 2021          LifeSite News

Dr. Michael Yeadon called vaccination of young women with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines ‘stupid and reckless,’ citing papers showing that toxic nanoparticles accumulate in ovaries.

(LifeSiteNews) – Scientists have known for nearly a decade that the lipid nanoparticles like those currently used in novel mRNA COVID vaccines accumulate in ovaries and are potentially toxic to reproductive health, a former vice president and top researcher at Pfizer said at a conference hosted by LifeSiteNews Thursday on the fertility dangers of COVID vaccines.   

 

“You’re not being told the truth,” said Michael Yeadon, former Pfizer Vice President and Chief Scientist Worldwide for Respiratory Pharmacology and Toxicology, who is now the Chief Scientific Advisor for the Truth for Health Foundation. “Thinking about this, I try to imagine that I was speaking to my own young adult daughters, for whom I would be very concerned if they got these vaccines.” 

Yeadon cited scientific papers dating back to 2012 that warn of potential reproductive hazards of lipid nanoparticles that are used in COVID shots.   

Both Moderna’s and Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines use specialized nanoparticle lipids or lipoproteins as carriers for their main ingredient – unstable mRNA protein that causes cells to produce the notorious coronavirus spike protein and elicit an immune response. These are the molecules that required the extremely low temperatures to preserve stability of the lipid encasing the fragile mRNA.

Accumulation in reproductive organs

German researchers reported in their paper published nine years ago, “Accumulation of nanocarriers in the ovary: A neglected toxicity risk?,” that there is a “potential toxicity risk of all nanoscaled drug delivery systems” and an accumulation of different microscopic carrier molecules in rodent ovaries. Their research involved injection of lipid “nanocarriers,” including some with an ingredient common to both Pfizer’s and Moderna’s mRNA COVID vaccines: polyethylene glycol. 

Instead of loading the carriers with drugs or mRNA, the researchers from Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmaceutics and the University of Regensburg loaded the nanocarriers with a fluorescent dye they could trace. They reported a “high local accumulation of nanoparticles” in “specific locations of the ovaries” in all mice and rats treated with five different nanocarrier drug delivery systems of different sizes.

More Here

mRNA Expert Speaks Out on the COVID Crisis

 

zByJoseph Mercola    August 9, 2021       LewRocwell.com

 

When Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA and DNA vaccine core platform technology,1 spoke out about the risks of COVID-19 gene therapy vaccines in June 2021, he was surprised that the three-hour interview went viral. “It showed there was a huge thirst for information from people all over the world,” he said, speaking with Aga Wilson with Newsvoice.2

The podcast was erased from YouTube, and Malone quickly realized that his message, which he felt morally obliged to share, would not be heard via mainstream media.

“When it became clear to me that I would not be able to speak through mainstream media, I, together with my wife … made a conscious decision to reach out through alternative media and new media, and I’ve learned, from many, many podcasts and podcasters like yourself about the value of this new medium of podcasting,” he told Wilson.3

Big Pharma and its vaccines

With Malone’s impressive credentials, his grave concerns about COVID-19 vaccines have made many stop and listen, and people started writing to him about their own problems with censorship and the spectrum of adverse events with the vaccine. It all started, Malone said, with a long conversation with a physician in Canada, who poured his heart out about what he was experiencing in Canada treating patients with COVID-19 and adverse events after vaccination.

He reported them to authorities but was dismissed and told they weren’t related to the injection even though, in his clinical opinion, they were. With the mass vaccination campaign in full effect, Malone was also disturbed that it is considered OK by the government to entice children to get vaccinated by offering them free ice cream or doughnuts, and even allowing children to get vaccinated without their parents’ consent.

He soon ventured into the bioethics of the emergency use authorization (EUA) granted to COVID-19 vaccines. Experimentation without proper informed consent violates the Nuremberg Code,4 which spells out a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation.

This set of principles was developed to ensure the medical horrors discovered during the Nuremberg trials at the end of World War II would never take place again, but in the current climate of extreme censorship, people are not being informed about the full risks of the vaccines — which are only beginning to be uncovered.

Further, due to the EUA, adults aren’t required to sign informed consent documents and, at the same time, aren’t being given a full disclosure of the risks that would normally be given during a clinical trial5 — and, at this point, anyone who receives the vaccine is participating as a research subject.

FDA Dismissed Malone’s Vaccine Warning

Through his professional career, Malone has worked closely with the U.S. government for many years. As such, he has kept an open dialogue with colleagues at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, with whom he discussed concerns about adverse events and the spike protein used in COVID-19 vaccines.

In its native form in SARS-CoV-2, the spike protein is responsible for the pathologies of the viral infection, and in its wild form it’s known to open the blood-brain barrier, cause cell damage (cytotoxicity) and, Malone said, “is active in manipulating the biology of the cells that coat the inside of your blood vessels — vascular endothelial cells, in part through its interaction with ACE2, which controls contraction in the blood vessels, blood pressure and other things.”6

More Here

By Peter Skurkiss     August 4, 2021     American Thinker

One of the biggest proponents behind the vaccine mania has been the health establishment. 

Why? Is it to protect public health from a deadly virus? How can that be the case when the mortality rate is relatively low for the Wuhan flu.

After all, the average (IFR) death rate of COVID is a mere 0.26% of those infected (this is the stat that the media consistently and deliberately refuses to mention in public). This means that 99.7% of the public is in no danger from COVID whether they are vaccinated or not.

The answer for the vaccine push has many facets and here I'll focus on just one -- Big Pharma. The pharmaceutical industry is a central part of the health establishment. It's the tail that wags that dog. Not surprisingly, it comes down to money. Last week, it was reported that pharmaceutical giants are raking in the money with the sale of their novel and inadequately tested COVID-19 vaccines. Pfizer expects to earn $33.5 billion in 2021. J&J estimates its full-year COVID-19 vaccine sales to be $2.5 billion while Moderna forecasts $19.2 billion. This is big money.

Pfizer has said it believes a third 'booster' dose of its vaccine will be needed in the future, which you help it bring in more sales in 2022. The company said it would file on July 28 for an emergency use authorization for a potential booster as early as August.

The Wuhan flu is proving to be a money tree for Big Pharma. As they keep shaking it, dollars fall into their lap.

Now a 'delta' variant has emerged. Will there soon be an epsilon variant and then a zeta one? Why not? We all know viruses naturally mutate. Where will it end, at an omega variant? Come hell or high water, you can be sure Big Pharma will be pushing its products. Corporate bonuses and the value of stock options are at stake.

More Here

On COVID, the left's own facts show the establishment is lying again

By Terry Paaulding        August 2, 2021     American Thinker

I want to suggest to my friends that there are alternatives to the nightly news — and, perhaps, that Mr. Biden got fewer than 80 million votes and that Sweden did quite well without lockdowns and mask mandates — but I can't because the fix is in.  There's a narrative that's been locked into our institutions, and the Democrats will not deviate from it.

I can't change the fix by myself.  How do you dismantle the damage to date?  How do you rebuild honesty and confidence?  Or is that what the Big Bang was — we already ran through this process beginning 14 billion years ago and couldn't go any farther, so someone mercifully pushed the reset button and we started again?  It's a huge waste of time if we have to go back to the beginning, but where we are now will take more than a fresh sheet of paper and an eraser to fix.

It starts with trust — those who have it and those who have lost it.

We put doctors on a pedestal in this country.  Watch any panel with a medical doctor on a cable news show.  You'll see everybody else addressed by his first names, but the doctor is always Dr. Whoever.  We're trained to defer to them and show respect.  What happens when we slowly lose faith in the medical profession, as many have?  We see the medical spokespersons self-contradicting from one moment to the next, or spouting "facts" we know are untrue or half-true.  Where does that leave us?

With COVID again dominating the news cycle, we're being fed yet another bunch of bunk.  It's not hard to catch the MSM, tech, government spokespersons, one and all, in lies and omissions, to see them foregoing scruples to feed a narrative benefitting only themselves.  The narrative makes so little sense, so news readers stumble over themselves, justifying it.

The newest talking point is calling the unvaccinated murderers, even mass murderers, in an attempt to put more pressure on those hesitant to conform.  Get the jab, or else be ostracized, persecuted, and maligned.  Then there's masking us into submission yet again, plus threatening more closures as "cases" rise.

They are telling us cases are rising alarmingly.  The government is causing the increase, by shipping hundreds of thousands of illegal migrants all over, without notifying the states or localities, and without making sure they're healthy.  This, after keeping them in mass detainment centers that can't help spreading not only COVID, but such delights as lice, scabies, and probably a bunch of diseases we've never heard of before, brought in from the multitude of countries shipping their impoverished to our border.

More Here

Lies and absurdities that damaged the COVID pandemic response

By Paul Elias Alexander, PhD    July 23, 2021     LifeSiteNews

Paul Elias Alexander, PhD, has expertise in the teaching of epidemiology (clinical epidemiology), evidence-based medicine, and research methodology. He is a former professor at McMaster University in evidence-based medicine; former COVID pandemic advisor to WHO-PAHO in Washington, D.C. (2020); and a former senior advisor on COVID pandemic policy at the U.S. government’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in Washington, D.C. He did graduate studies at the University of Oxford in England, the University of Toronto in Canada, McMaster University in Canada, and York University in Canada. He is currently an independent academic scientist and consultant.

July 23, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – Below I will highlight the lies, misinformation, and efforts to deceive the American people (and the world) and the former president as to the response to the COVID “pandemic.”

These blatant lies severely hobbled and essentially doomed the U.S. pandemic response from February 2020 onwards. That response continues today under the new administration, which is being advised by illogical, nonsensical, and simply incompetent holdover advisors as well as new ones. These so-called “experts” are politicized and seemingly corrupted and spew utter nonsense and dangerous advice that harms the people. They are aided by an hysterical, corrupted media that seeks to confuse and deceive the public at every turn. Something other than science was at play here and I suspect as time goes by, we will come to learn what the underlying motivation has been. I refer below to what I consider to be bald-faced lies that go beyond mistakes (note, this is my opinion):

1) This COVID-19 pandemic was never the “emergency” that governments, technocrats and the medical community and task forces told you it was. COVID-19 was not as severe as SARS-1 (2002-2003) or MERS (2012). It was not the bubonic plague, it was never what authorities made it out to be, and they have lied repeatedly to their populations. The infection fatality rate at most is 0.15% (at most 0.2%) and less than 0.05% when you look at ages 70 years old and below. CDC data showed that the risk of survival for persons 0-19 is 99.997%. Near 100%. Everything that our governments and the media told us and did were pure lies.

Only for the first three weeks at most in February and March 2020 did we need some pause or restriction to gain an understanding of the pathogen. After that initial period, none of the lockdowns or school closures were needed. Yet we did this and the public needlessly suffered.

People needlessly died in the U.S. and children died due to these failed, specious lockdown policies put out by government “task forces.”

These “task forces,” including in the U.S., have lied to the people and driven damaging fear.

Economies were crushed, businesses were closed forever. We very early on understood the parameters and yet governments and their inept “task forces” did not care. They enacted unscientific, unsound polices that did nothing other than kill people through the lockdowns, not the virus. History will record that the pandemic response – what was done to populations by their governments – was the greatest public health disaster in history. The vaccines will match this and I will state openly: you should not take these vaccines. It is likely you are already immune. A vaccine was never needed for this virus. ...

More Here

Bombshell lawsuit: Gov’t whistleblower says coronavirus vaccine deaths at least 45,000

By Patrick Delaney     July 22, 2021     LifeSiteNews

‘I queried data … and have assessed that the deaths occurring within 3 days of vaccination are higher than those reported in VAERS by a factor of at least 5. This would indicate the true number of vaccine-related deaths was at least 45,000.’

ANAHEIM, California, July 22, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – A government related computer programmer, who works in health care data analytics, has made a declaration under penalty of perjury that according to medical claims submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) there are “at least 45,000” vaccine-related deaths due to experimental COVID-19 vaccine injections. 

This dramatic announcement was made earlier this week by Ohio-based attorney Thomas Renz, at Clay Clark's ReAwaken America Tour stop in Anaheim California. Renz remains a lead attorney in several major cases brought against federal agencies relating to fraud and violations of medical freedom rights.  

More Here

The COVID pandemic narrative takes another hit

By Antonio R. Chaves   July 22, 2021     American Thinker

For months, bloggers on the fringe of alternative media have been characterizing COVID-19 and its aftermath as a "plandemic" that had been planned out during two pandemic simulations: SPARS in 2017 and Event 201 in 2019.  These conferences were supposedly organized to anticipate the policies and resources that would be needed to fight the next pandemic.  Believers in the plandemic scenario discussed parallels between these simulations and today's pandemic that ranged from the concrete to the fanciful, but neither proved beyond the shadow of a doubt that COVID-19 had been planned.  Then along came testimony from the chair of M-CAM, an international finance company that keeps track of patent applications.

Patent records accessed by M-CAM show that not once, but twice, U.S. drug companies colluded with government agencies to patent treatments before two disease outbreaks took place.  First, between the CDC and Sequoia Pharmaceuticals for treating SARS in 2003.  Second, between Moderna and NIAID in November 2019 for treating COVID-19.  Martin points out that the holdings of Sequoia were later rolled into Pfizer, Crucell, and Johnson & Johnson.  It is no coincidence that two of these three companies (along with Moderna) are now producing vaccines for COVID.

 

 

More Here

 

 

Peter Navarro: ‘St. Fauci’ and Others Have Blood on Hands After Blocking Trump Admin. From Distributing 60 Million HCQ Tablets

By Debra Heine         June 10, 2021     American Greatness

It turns out that the anti-malaria drug former president Trump famously touted in March of 2020 as a promising treatment for COVID-19, would indeed have been a “game changer” if only it had been widely used.

Use of Hydroxychloroquine to treat the coronavirus can increase survival rates by over 100 percent, according to a new study.

“Scientists found that, when ventilated patients with a severe version of COVID were given high doses of hydroxychloroquine with zinc, their survival rates could increase dramatically,” the Daily Mail reported.

The authors of the new report say: “We found that when the cumulative doses of two drugs, HCQ and AZM, were above a certain level, patients had a survival rate 2.9 times the other patients.”

Navarro, who had been tasked with helping to distribute the pills, also blasted the FDA’s decision in June of 2020.

“This is a Deep State blindside by bureaucrats who hate the administration they work for more than they’re concerned about saving American lives,” Navarro fumed in an interview with the New York Times. 

Some medical experts have estimated that as many as 100,000 lives could potentially have been saved if Hydroxychloroquine had been widely used in 2020.

More here

 

Tucker Carlson interviews Dr. Peter McCullough: Where is the conversation about COVID treatments?

LifeSite News   May 21, 2021

Dr. Peter McCullough, author of the American Journal of Medicine’s most downloaded paper on COVID treatments, estimated 85% of COVID deaths could have been prevented if health officials, politicians and physicians had focused less on vaccines and more on early preventive therapies.

 

McCullough published his first findings on how to stop COVID hospitalizations and deaths in the American Journal of Medicine in August 2020. Today, his work remains the most downloaded and utilized paper during the pandemic from the American Journal of Medicine.

McCullough, who has treated many COVID patients, told Carlson there’s “been a global oblivion” to the idea of treating patients with COVID-19. There are effective outpatient treatments, said McCullough, including monoclonal antibodies such as Regeneron and intracellular anti-infectives including hydroxychloroquine.

 

More Here

 

 

 

 

CDC caught massively inflating coronavirus cases, deaths in violation of federal law

 

By Ethan Huff           February 20, 2021

 

(Natural News) A new study found that the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been massively inflating its Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “case” and death counts to make the “pandemic” appear far worse than it actually is.

Entitled, “COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal Law: A Historical Retrospective,” the paper estimates that the official death numbers for the Chinese virus are at least 1,600 percent too high, which was done on purpose to thwart the outcome of the 2020 election.

Not only that, but the CDC is blatantly violating federal law in the way it collects and reports data about the impact of Chinese germs throughout America. The for-profit corporation is essentially lying to the public as it pushes for even more restrictions, such as double-masking.

“The groundbreaking peer-reviewed research … asserts that the CDC willfully violated multiple federal laws including the Information Quality Act, Paperwork Reduction Act, and Administrative Procedures Act at minimum,” said the watchdog group All Concerned Citizens in a statement to the National File.

“Most notably, the CDC illegally enacted new rules for data collection and reporting exclusively for COVID-19 that resulted in a 1,600% inflation of current COVID-19 fatality totals.”

The statement goes on to explain that the CDC failed both to apply for mandatory federal oversight and to open up a mandatory period for public scientific comment, both of which are required under federal law, even during “emergency” situations.

“The research asserts that CDC willfully compromised the accuracy and integrity of all COVID-19 case and fatality data from the onset of this crisis in order to fraudulently inflate case and fatality data,” All Concerned Citizens further claims.

On March 24, 2020, the CDC published a document called the “NVSS COVID-19 Alert No. 2,” which instructs medical examiners, coroners and physicians to basically categorize every death as a “Covid” death.

Rather than continue, as has long been the norm, to list pre-existing conditions and other underlying causes of death on official death certificates, the CDC scrapped all that once the WuFlu emerged to make every death appear like a “Covid” death.

“This was a major rule change for death certificate reporting from the CDC’s 2003 Coroners’ Handbook on Death Registration and Fetal Death Reporting and Physicians’ Handbook on Medical Certification of Death, which have instructed death reporting professionals nationwide to report underlying conditions in Part I for the previous 17 years,” the National File reports.

“This single change resulted in a significant inflation of COVID-19 fatalities by instructing that COVID-19 be listed in Part I of death certificates as a definitive cause of death regardless of confirmatory evidence, rather than listed in Part II as a contributor to death in the presence of pre-existing conditions, as would have been done using the 2003 guidelines.”

More Here

 

Decorated Scientist Says Wuhan Lab Caused Pandemic, Contradicting WHO

 by Luis Miguel         February 19, 2021

In contradiction to claims by the World Health Organization, a recent study conducted by University of Hamburg researcher Roland Wiesendanger determined that China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology was, in fact, the “cause” of COVID-19.

Wiesendanger, a three-time recipient of the European Research Council grant, asked in his 105-page report: “Is the current global crisis actually the result of a coincidence in nature — a coincidental mutation of a coronavirus in a bat with the assistance of an intermediate host — or the result of a scientist’s carelessness when carrying out the project in high-risk research with global pandemic potential?”

He cited 600 facts that support his theory that “the number and the quality of evidence clearly indicate a laboratory accident at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

Among the evidence Wiesendanger cites are the following facts: The host has still not been identified; the virus can “couple surprisingly well to human cell receptors,” the Wuhan lab “carried out genetic manipulations on coronaviruses for many years with the aim of making them more contagious, dangerous and deadly for humans,” and that the facility had “significant safety deficiencies.”